Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2021/Gaslighting and emotion

In-text links

Hey Rani, I just edited your links to 'gaslighting' and 'antisocial personality disorder' as they were currently linking to wikiversity pages that didn't exist. The easiest way to do this is to go into source editing, and type: [ [ w :(wikipedia/versity article, e.g., gaslighting) ] ] without the spaces. You can add a hashtag at the end to link to a specific section too. E.g., [ [ w : gaslighting # In politics| In politics ] ]

Good luck! Michael, u3170151 U3170151 (discuss • contribs) 06:34, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Comment

Hey!

I am quite interested in your topic, and looking forward to reading more about your research! Can I suggest you a video to watch which discusses how to deal with gaslighting? How to deal with gaslighting | Ariel Leve. Hope you find it interesting or helpful! U3199859 (discuss • contribs) 17:44, 29 August 2021 (UTC) = U3199859

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted User page Excellent - used effectively Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution Summarised with direct link(s) to evidence. Use a numbered list. Headings Excellent Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic. Key points Overview - Consider adding: a description of what will be covered an image an example or case study Key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations. For sections which include sub-section include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings. Applied focus is excellent. Expand psychological theory and research. Some use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters. Conclusion (the most important section): hasn't been developed what might the take-home, practical messages be? in a nutshell, what are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title? Figure Excellent Cite each figure at least once in the main text. References OK For APA referencing style, check and correct: alphabetical order doi formatting Resources See also OK - formatting corrected External links None provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:16, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Comment

Hello!

I find your topic quite interesting, as I am sure a lot of people do, and I am excited for it to develop more! The things I noticed that could assist you to enhance your book chapter would be: - include more interactive content such as case studies and/or quizzes - include some more images relevant to gaslighting - maybe hyperlink some interesting videos on the topic? I'm sure there would be quite a few ted talks on this topic Good luck and I look forward to checking back in soon :) --U3202023 03:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a succint, highly readable explanation of gaslighting from a psychological perspective. The main area for potential improvement is to provide more detail about the research that has been conducted, even if limited. In fact, that is all the more reason to describe it in more detail. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits. Overview Excellent Overview. Clear focus question(s). Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest. Theory — Breadth Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained. Perhaps also consider how the dark triad personality dimensions may contribute to gaslighting. The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory. Theory — Depth Appropriate depth is provided about the selected theory(ies). Some useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts. More examples of solutions (to follow-up the problems) could be useful to illustrate potential ways to address gaslighting. Perhaps also consider the extent to which gaslighting may occur on its own versus as a cluster of other abusive behaviours. Research — Key findings Relevant research is cited. More detail about the limited gaslighted research, especially key studies, and related research would be ideal. Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful. Research — Critical thinking Very good critical thinking about research is evident. Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships suggesting specific directions for future research Integration Discussion of theory and research is well integrated. Conclusion A basic Conclusion is provided. Consider: Reminding the reader about the importance of the problem or phenomenon of interest. Adding practical, take-home messages. Written expression — Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good. Avoid one sentence paragraphs. A paragraph should typically consist of three to five sentences. "People" is often a better term than "individuals". Layout Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading - use 0 or 2+ sub-headings. Grammar Check and correct use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's vs individuals').[1]. Use serial commas[2] - they are part of APA style and are generally recommended by grammaticists. Here's an explanatory video (1 min). APA style Figures and tables Refer to each Table and Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1). Figures are very well captioned. Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example: If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either: in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020) References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation[3] Check and correct use of italicisation Include hyperlinked dois Written expression — Learning features Overall, the use of learning features is very good. Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Basic use of image(s). No use of table(s). Excellent use of feature box(es). Very good use of quiz(zes). Very good use of case studies or examples. 1]]. Social contribution ~ logged, useful, minor/moderate/major social contributions with direct links to evidence. ~ logged social contributions without direct links to evidence, so unable to easily verify and assess. No logged social contributions. Contributions made across three platforms.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:57, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent presentation. Overview The full title and sub-title are missing from the opening slide - this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A context for the topic is established. Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. The presentation has engaging start to attract viewer interest. Content The presentation addresses the topic. An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little. The presentation is well structured. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory. The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological research. The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice. The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information. Conclusion A Conclusion is presented with good take-home message(s). The presentation could be strengthened by expanding on the take-home message (e.g., answers to more than one focus question). Audio The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to. The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio. Audio communication is clear and well paced. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point. Good intonation enhances listener interest and engagement. Audio recording quality was excellent. Mute the music during narration to help the viewer concentrate on the combination of visual information and narrated audio. Video Overall, visual display quality is excellent. The presentation makes effective use of animated slides. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read. The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams. The presentation is very well produced. Meta-data The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a version of it) is not used in the name of the presentation - the latter would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding. Links to and from the book chapter are provided. Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are not provided. Probably the images are all from PowToon but this is not explicitly stated. A copyright license for the presentation is provided in the presentation description but not in the meta-data.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 19:50, 18 November 2021 (UTC)