Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2021/Amusement


Topic development feedback

edit

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

 
  1. The title is correctly worded and formatted
  2. The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted
  1. Excellent - used effectively
  2. Description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter
  1. Summarised with indirect link(s) to evidence
  2. Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
  1. Minimalistic, 1-level heading structure
  2. It would make logical sense to use the sub-title questions as stop-level headings. Then consider further development of sub-headings in those sections.
  1. Basic development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
  2. Overview - Consider adding:
    1. a description of the problem and what will be covered
    2. focus questions
    3. an image
    4. an example or case study
  3. Direct quotes need page numbers (APA style) - even better, write in your own words
  4. Perhaps discuss and consider schadenfreude as a type of amusement
  5. Amusement could also be discussed in relation to curiousity and the emotion of interest
  6. Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research
  7. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters. This is particularly important for this chapter as there are several other chapters about closely related concepts.
  8. Consider including more examples/case studies
  9. Cite each reference at least once in the main text.
  10. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. under developed
    2. what might the take-home, practical messages be?
    3. in a nutshell, what are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title?
  1. Excellent
  2. Caption explains how the image connects to key points being made in the main text
  3. Cite each figure at least once in the main text
  1. OK
  2. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. capitalisation
    2. italicisation
    3. volume and issue formatting
    4. page number formatting
    5. doi formatting
  1. See also
    1. Excellent
    2. Also link to relevant book chapters
  2. External links
    1. Excellent

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Relevant Articles

edit

Hello! I found this article, which may be of some help, as well as this video which discusses humour! - Joekon200029, 12:33pm 5 October 2021, (discuss, [[1]]

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

 

Overall

edit
  1. Overall, this is a very good presentation.
  1. Display and narrate a slide with the title and sub-title to help the viewer understand the purpose of the presentation.
  2. This presentation has an engaging introduction to hook audience interest.
  3. A context for the topic is established.
  4. Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation.
  1. The presentation addresses the topic.
  2. An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little.
  3. The presentation is well structured.
  4. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory.
  5. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological research.
  6. The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice.
  7. The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information.
  1. A Conclusion is presented with promising take-home message(s).
  2. The last part of the Conclusion did not fit within the time limit.
  1. The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to.
  2. The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio.
  3. Audio communication is clear and well paced.
  4. Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement.
  5. The narration is well polished.
  6. Audio recording quality was good/.
  7. Mute the music during narration to help the viewer concentrate on the combination of visual information and narrated audio.
  1. Overall, visual display quality is excellent.
  2. The presentation makes effective use of animated slides.
  3. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read.
  4. The amount of text presented on some slides could be reduced to make it easier to read and listen at the same time.
    1. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams.
  5. The presentation is very well produced.
  1. The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
  3. Links to and from the book chapter are provided.
  1. Image sources and their copyright status are communicated.
  2. A copyright license for the presentation is provided in the presentation description but not in the meta-data.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Chapter review and feedback

edit

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

 

Overall

edit
  1. Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
  2. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits.
  1. Solid Overview.
  2. Explains the problem or phenomenon.
  3. Clear focus question(s).
  4. Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest.
  1. Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained.
  2. Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters in this category: Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Humour).
  3. There is too much general theoretical material. Instead, summarise and link to further information (such as other book chapters or Wikipedia articles), to allow this chapter to focus on the specific topic (i.e., the sub-title question).
  1. Appropriate depth is provided about the selected theory(ies).
  2. Tables and/or lists are used effectively to help clearly convey key theoretical information.
  3. Some useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts.
  4. More examples could be useful to illustrate key concepts.
  1. Relevant research is well reviewed.
  2. Greater emphasis on effect sizes, major reviews, and/or meta-analyses would be helpful.
  1. Very good critical thinking about research is evident.
  1. Discussion of theory and research is well integrated.
  1. Key points are well summarised.
  2. Clear take-home message(s).
  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is very good.
  2. Layout
    1. Sections which branch into sub-sections should include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections.
  3. Grammar
    1. Use serial commas[2] — they are part of APA style and are generally recommended by grammaticists. Here's an explanatory video (1 min).
  4. APA style
    1. Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression; use quotation marks only for the first occurrence of the word or phrase, not for subsequent occurrences" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159).
    2. Do not capitalise the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc..
    3. Figures
      1. Figures are very well captioned.
      2. Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1).
    4. Tables
      1. Table captions use APA style.
      2. Refer to each Table using APA style.
    5. Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example:
      1. If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either:
        1. in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or
        2. in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020)
      2. Use ampersand (&) inside parentheses and "and" outside parentheses.
    6. References are not in full APA style. For example:
      1. Check and correct how to report volume numbers and page numbers.
      2. Check and correct use of capitalisation[3]
      3. Page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
  1. Overall, the use of learning features is very good.
  2. Very good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. # No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  3. Very good use of image(s).
  4. Good use of table(s).
  5. Basic use of feature box(es).
  6. No use of quiz(zes).
  7. Good use of case studies or examples.
  8. Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section.
  9. Excellent use of external links in the "External links" section.
  1. ~4 logged, useful, minor to moderate social contributions mostly at end of semester with direct links to evidence.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:30, 25 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Return to "Motivation and emotion/Book/2021/Amusement" page.