Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
Sections which include sub-sections should also include an overview paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is a promising but insufficient chapter.
The main areas for potential improvement are:
Expanding the theoretical connection between UB and related concepts. Since there is somewhat limited information about UB per se, it is necessary to provide a broader theoretical context.
Expanding the review of research about UB and its effects.
The quality of written expression can be improved.
More examples/case studies and practical suggestions could be provided.
Relatively few peer-reviewed references are currently used.
Overall, this chapter makes insufficient use of research.
When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicating the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful.
Overall, the quality of written expression is basic.
Some sentences are overly long; consider splitting them into shorter, separate sentences.
Layout
Sections which include sub-sections should also include an introductory paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading - use 0 or 2+ sub-headings.
Learning features
Table 1 and Figure 1 seem to be somewhat redundant; consider integrating into a single, more comprehensive figure or table.
No use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive.
One use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding more in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
One use of image(s).
One use of table(s).
Basic use of feature box(es).
Basic use of quiz(zes).
Abbreviations
Check and correct grammatical formatting for abbreviations (such as e.g., i.e.., etc.).
Abbreviations (such as e.g., i.e.., etc.) should only be used inside parentheses.
Grammar
The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags).
Check and correct use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's vs individuals').
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides with narrated audio.
Well paced. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
The audio communication is hesitant in places - could benefit from further practice.
The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read.
The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images.
The video is poorly produced and lacks the polish that comes with practice.
The sub-title is missing from the video title.
Audio recording quality was good.
Visual display quality was excellent.
Image sources and their copyright status are/not provided. Either acknowledge the image sources and their licenses in the video description or remove the presentation.
A copyright license for the presentation is provided in the video description but not in the meta-data.
A link to the book chapter is provided.
A link from the book chapter is provided.
A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.