Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2020/Psychological resilience during COVID-19 pandemic isolation

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title Excellent Note that we could revise this topic to remove "COVID-19" so that the focus is on PR during pandemic isolation. DM me if you want to go this route. User page Excellent - used effectively Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Social contribution None summarised with link(s) to evidence. Section headings Probably an overly complicated 2-level structure - consider simplifying to focus on the topic (the sub-title). Sections which include sub-sections should also include an overview paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings. Key points Incomplete and insufficiently focused on the topic (i.e., not enough about PR during pandemic isolation). Make ensure to access and cite current (2020) research on this topic. Image Excellent References Good Excellent For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation italicisation Resources See also Use bullet-points External links Use bullet-points Include source in brackets after link

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

The pandemic is testing and building our resilience

@Zacharydodemaide: This news article may be of interest: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-09-20/the-pandemic-is-testing-and-building-our-resilience/12645906 Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 20:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Guest lecture

@Zacharydodemaide: You may be interested to attend this online lecture next week: "RSP Annual Lecture - From individual fragility to collective resilience: the two psychologies of COVID-19 with Professor Stephen Reicher" https://psychology.anu.edu.au/news-events/events/rsp-annual-lecture-individual-fragility-collective-resilience-two-psychologies Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:12, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback

Hey! I found an article that talks about resilience strategies to manage psychological distress among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. It talks about psychological consequences and has a few preventative strategies which may be useful for your book chapter. I hope this helps! https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/anae.15180 --Taylor Mamukic (discuss • contribs) 22:46, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this chapter does a reasonably good job of applying psychological theory and research to a real-world problem. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits. Theory Relevant theory is reasonably well explained. Research Relevant research is well reviewed and discussed in relation to theory. Some claims are unreferenced (e.g., see the tags). When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicating the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship. Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful. Written expression Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is OK. Use 3rd person perspective rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you")[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes. "People" is often a better term than "individuals"; similarly "participants" is preferred to "subjects". Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences. Internationalise: Write for an international, not just a domestic audience. Australians make up only 0.32% of the world human population. Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead: it is, most often, not needed at all, or use section linking. Layout Sections which include sub-sections should also include an introductory paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings. Learning features Format bullet-points and numbered lists, per Tutorial 1. No use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Very basic use of image(s). No use of table(s). Basicuse of feature box(es). No use of quiz(zes). Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags). Check and make correct use of commas. Use serial commas[2] - it is part of APA style and generally recommended by grammaticists. Here's a 1 min. explanatory video. Check and correct use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's vs individuals').[3]. Proofreading Replace double spaces with single spaces. APA style Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression; use quotation marks only for the first occurrence of the word or phrase, not for subsequent occurrences" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159). Figures and tables Refer to each Table and Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1). Citations are not in full APA style. For example: Use ampersand (&) inside brackets and "and" outside brackets. If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either: in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020) References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of italicisation. Social contribution ~5 logged, useful, social contributions with direct links to evidence.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:12, 26 November 2020 (UTC)