Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2020/Compassion fatigue

Who does compassion fatigue affect?

It could be interesting to include a bit explaining what causes passion fatigue and who is most vulnerable! U3175516 (discuss • contribs) 08:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Psychologists

Psychologists can also suffer from compassion fatigue. There are strategies to help psychologists cope (collaboration with other health care workers etc.) This could be an interesting topic to include in your chapter as well. --U3037228 (discuss • contribs) 08:11, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi There! Might also be beneficial to include a case study/example study of psychologist or nurses who have experienced compassion fatigue. Also might be worth exploring the concept that every psychologist needs a psychologist because of the toll it takes on ones wellbeing.U3174214 (discuss • contribs) 08:47, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Compassion Fatigue in Marriage and Family Therapy

Similar to what was previously mentioned about psychologists experiencing compassion fatigue, this is an interesting article featuring a section on therapists who specialise in traumas and grief Compassion Fatigue in Marriage and Family Therapy: Implications for Therapists and ClientsNegash, Sesen ; Sahin, SedaJournal of Marital and Family Therapy, 2011-01, Vol.37 (1), p.1-13 --U3065346 (discuss • contribs) 12:57, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Helpful article

I found an article that might be helpful to consider which looks at compassion fatigue among Healthcare, Emergency and Community Service Workers. I think it is well written and provides valuable information on the topic. The link is here, hope it helps ! - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924075/ --U3192645 (discuss • contribs) 06:22, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title Excellent User page Created - minimal, but sufficient Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Social contribution Summarised with link(s) to evidence. Section headings Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic. Sections which include sub-sections should also include an overview paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings. Key points Overview - Consider adding: an image an example or case study Very good applied focus Expand theory and research. Conclusion (the most important section): hasn't been developed what might the take-home, practical messages be? Image Excellent Cite each figure at least once in the main text. References Very good For APA referencing style, check and correct: italicisation Resources Very good Provide outside in brackets after the link

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits. Theory Relevant theories are well selected, described, integrated, and explained. Research Relevant research is well reviewed and discussed in relation to theory. When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicating the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship. Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful. Written expression Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good. Learning features Good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Good use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Very good use of image(s). Basic use of table(s). Heading for column 2? Good use of feature box(es). Good use of quiz(zes). Good use of case studies or examples. Grammar, spelling, and proofreading are very good. APA style Direct quotes should use double quotation marks and include page numbers. Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression; use quotation marks only for the first occurrence of the word or phrase, not for subsequent occurrences" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159). Figures and tables Use APA style for Table captions. See example. Citations use correct APA style. References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation. Social contribution ~6 logged, useful, social contributions with mostly direct links to evidence.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a good presentation. Structure and content Comments about the book chapter also apply to this section. An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little. The presentation is well structured. Consider adding and narrating an Overview slide (e.g., with focus questions), to help orientate the viewer about what will be covered. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory. The presentation makes little use of psychological research. The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies. A Conclusion slide is presented with a take-home message(s). Communication The presentation is easy to follow. The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides with narrated audio. The presentation makes basic use of text based slides with narrated audio. Well paced.# The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images. Production quality The video is well produced using simple tools. The chapter title and sub-title are used in the name of presentation and on the opening slide - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Audio recording quality was very good. Visual display quality was excellent. Image sources and their copyright status are provided. A copyright license for the presentation is provided. A link to the book chapter is provided. A link from the book chapter is provided. A written description of the presentation is not provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:30, 29 November 2020 (UTC)