Hi there, I noticed that your first image is quite small - I would recommend increasing the size. The way to do this can be found here. This will assist with the image size as well as the location and title. Additionally, to meet APA guidelines ensure you input Figure 1. in italics under the image.
All the best with submission!
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey there! I think it would be helpful to research how cognitive dissonance effects smoking motivation! Smoking has a received a lot of attention within research and including this topic should conceptualise cognitive dissonance easily for the readers :) --U3190016 (discuss • contribs) 12:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Addressing the topic development feedback could have helped to improve this chapter. Given that the earlier feedback appears to be largely ignored, minimal additional feedback is provided on the final submission.
For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits.
Overall, this chapter makes insufficient use of research.
When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicating the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful.
Overall, the quality of written expression is below professional standard.
Avoid starting sentences with a citation unless the author is particularly pertinent. Instead, it is more interesting for the the content/key point to be communicated, with the citation included along the way or, more typically, in brackets at the end of the sentence.
Sections which include sub-sections should also include an introductory paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
Learning features
See also and external links
Use bullet-points (e.g., for the see also section), per Tutorial 1.
Move external links from the see also section to the external links section.
Rename links so they are more user-friendly, per Tutorial 1.
Include the source in parentheses after the link
No use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Ideally, use in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters. Other links can be moved to the external links section.
Basic use of image(s).
Basic use of table(s).
No use of feature box(es).
No use of quiz(zes).
Grammar
The grammar for many sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags).
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little.
The presentation is well structured.
The opening suggestions that social psychological theory will be used. But the focus should be on motivational theory and possibly cognitive theory, given the topic.
The presentation makes basic use of theory.
The presentation makes little use of research.
The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies.
A Conclusion slide is presented, but it lacks take-home message(s).
The presentation makes basic use of text based slides with narrated audio.
Well paced. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read.
The visual communication could be improved by including some relevant images.
The sub-title is missing in both the video title and on the opening slide - this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
Audio recording quality was excellent.
Visual display quality was good.
Image sources and their copyright status are not provided. Either acknowledge the image sources and their licenses in the video description or remove the presentation.
This presentation may have violated the copyrights of image owners as images appear to have been used without permission and/or acknowledgement.
A copyright license for the presentation is not provided.
A link to the book chapter is/not provided.
An active link to the book chapter is not provided.
A link from the book chapter is not provided.
A written description of the presentation is not provided.