Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there, it looks like you have quite a lot of content going into this chapter, to minimize the risk of exceeding the word count you could try to condense the theoretic principles and / or identity sections into tables or brief summaries to allow more space to cover the vast amount of applications you have listed which addresses the topic question directly. Cheers :)
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Basic but sufficient coverage of relevant theory is provided.
The explanation of AIT in this chapter could be significantly improved by providing more practical examples and possibly case studies. It is one thing to explain an abstract idea; it another thing to make it easy to understand through a salient example.
Overall, the quality of written expression is basic.
A lot of the written expression is very abstract, which makes the chapter difficult to read, especailly for an unfamiliar reader. Consider ways of simplifying the written expression to make it more accessible to a wider audience. This is the essence of science communication.
Some sentences are overly long; consider splitting them into shorter, separate sentences.
Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences.
Use 3rd person perspective rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you")[1].
Sections which include sub-sections should also include an introductory paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
Learning features
Basic use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Ideally, use in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters. Other links can be moved to the external links section.
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
There is too much content to present within the allocated time frame. Zoom out and provide a higher-level presentation at a slower pace. It is best to do a small amount well than a large amount poorly.
The presentation is well structured.
The presentation makes excellent use of theory.
The presentation makes excellent use of research.
The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples or case studies.
The chapter title but not the sub-title are used in the video title - the latter would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
The chapter title and sub-title are used on the opening slide - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
Audio recording quality was excellent.
Visual display quality was excellent.
Image sources and their copyright status are not provided. If you created this infographic, it is excellent - ideally, upload to Wiki Commons and use in the book chapter too.
A copyright license for the presentation is not provided.
A link to the book chapter is provided.
A link from the book chapter is provided.
A written description of the presentation is not provided.