Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
Basic, 2-level heading structure - could benefit from further development
Sections which include sub-sections should also include an overview paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
Avoid providing too much background information. Instead, briefly summarise generic concepts and provide internal wiki links to further information. Then the focus of most of the content can be on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
Basic development of key points, but relatively little about theory and research on emotions of those recovering from burn injury - this is the most important.
Use APA style for citations
Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters.
Consider introducing a case study in the Overview.
Consider including more examples/case studies.
Consider embedding one quiz question per major section rather than having one longer quiz towards the end.
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hey there! looks like you have some really good ideas for your chapter, I'm excited to see where you go with it. I noticed that you haven't yet included any examples or case studies. If you don't have any in mind I wanted to suggest burn victim Turia Pitt. Something that makes her different from other possible case studies is that there is endless amount of information on her experience. Turia has her own website and has written 4 different books (I've linked below) detailing her entire story. These would contain a lot about the emotions she went through so I figure she could be a really great person to highlight in your chapter.
Website: https://www.turiapitt.com
Books: https://www.turiapitt.com/shop/
Good evening! I like the way you have set out your page with headings and sub-headings. I'm interested to see how your page is going to look/read when you are finished! I found a couple of articles that I thought you might be able to find useful in your research on the topic:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC509350/ (psychosocial aspects of burn injuries).
Izard, C. E. (2010) The many meanings/aspects of emotion: definitions, functions, activation, and regulation. Emotion Review, 2, 363-370. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1754073910374661
I hope these help, good luck! --MPollard10 (discuss • contribs) 10:08, 16 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn Canvas, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is a solid, promising chapter that explores psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
The chapter could benefit from further development of the Overview.
Several interesting case studies are provided. They could be improved by applying theory and research.
For additional feedback, see following comments and these copyedits.
Basic but sufficient coverage of research involving the relation between the target constructs is provided. More depth of research review could be provided (e.g., there is no indepth discussion of the top research studies in this area).
Consider describing the research outcomes for the various forms of intervention.
When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful.
Overall, the quality of written expression is very good.
Avoid one sentence paragraphs. A paragraph should typically consist of three to five sentences.
Use third person perspective rather than first person (e.g., "we") or second person (e.g., "you") perspective[1].
Layout
The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections.
Sections which include sub-sections should also include an introductory paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
Learning features
Excellent use of embedded interwiki links to Wikipedia articles.
No use of embedded links to related book chapters. Embedding links links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Canvas site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.