Template:Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Multimedia/Feedback/2024
Feedback template for the multimedia presentation for the Motivation and emotion unit.
Designed to be transcluded on a chapter talk page.
Simple example
| ||
|---|---|---|
Usage — Default exampleedit{{MEMF/2024
|1=
|2=
|3=
|4=
|5=
|6=
|7=
|8=
}}
~~~~
creates: Multimedia presentation feedback
|
Detailed example
| ||
|---|---|---|
Detailed exampleeditThis is the template syntax with some prefilled comments: {{MEMF/2024
|1=
<!-- Overall comments ... -->
<!-- Overall - Overall -->
# Overall, this is an excellent/very good/reasonably good/basic presentation
# Overall, this is an insufficient presentation mainly because it lacks sufficient synthesis of the best psychological theory and research about this topic
<!-- Overall - Time -->
# The presentation is under the maximum time limit (3 mins). Room for further development.
# The presentation is over the maximum time limit. Content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes.
|2=
<!-- Overview comments ... -->
<!-- Overview - Opening -->
# The opening clearly conveys the purpose of the presentation
# The opening conveys the purpose of the presentation in a very good/good/reasonably good/basic way
# The opening does not adequately convey the purpose of the presentation
<!-- Overview - Introduction -->
# Very engaging introduction to hook audience interest {{smile}}
# Engaging introduction to hook audience interest
# The presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest
# Create an engaging introduction to hook audience interest (e.g., through an example)
<!-- Overview - Context -->
# A context for the presentation is clearly established through an example
# A context for the presentation is established through an example
# A context for the presentation is established
# A basic context for the presentation is established
# Establish a context for the presentation (e.g., use an example or explain importance)
<!-- Overview - Focus -->
# Focus questions and/or an outline of topics are presented
# Consider asking focus questions to help focus and discipline the presentation
|3=
<!-- Content comments ... -->
# Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
<!-- Content - Addresses topic -->
# The presentation addresses/somewhat addresses/does not adequately address the topic
<!-- Content - Amount -->
# An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little
# There is too much content (goes over time). Provide a higher-level presentation. It is better to cover a small amount of well-selected content well than a large amount poorly.
# The selected content doesn't sufficiently use the most relevant psychological theory and/or research about the topic
<!-- Content - Theory -->
# The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic/insufficient/no use of relevant psychological theory
<!-- Content - Research -->
# The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic/insufficient/no use of relevant psychological research
<!-- Content - Citations -->
# The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic/insufficient/no use of citations to support claims
<!-- Content - Examples -->
# The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic/insufficient/no use of examples
<!-- Content - Practical advice -->
# The presentation provides useful/good/basic practical advice
# The presentation could be improved by providing practical advice
<!-- Content - Easy to understand -->
# The presentation provides easy to understand information
# Provide easy to understand information
|4=
<!-- Conclusion comments ... -->
<!-- Conclusion - Summary and take-aways -->
# The conclusion provides an excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic
# The conclusion provides excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic take-home message(s)
# Provide a conclusion which summarises the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic, with take-home messages for each focus question
<!-- Conclusion - Time -->
# The Conclusion only partly fitted within the time limit
# The Conclusion did not fit within the time limit
|5=
<!-- Audio comments ... -->
<!-- Audio - Easy to follow -->
# The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to
# The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to
# The audio is easy to follow
# The audio is hard to follow because so much content is presented so quickly
<!-- Audio - Narration -->
# The presentation makes effective/very good/good/reasonably good/basic use of narrated audio
<!-- Audio - Pacing -->
# Audio communication is reasonably well-paced
# Consider slowing down and leaving longer pauses between sentences. This can help the listener to cognitively process the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
# Slow down and leave longer pauses between sentences. This will help viewers to cognitively process the spoken information as it is being presented, before moving on to the next point.
<!-- Audio - Voice -->
# Excellent/Very good/Good/Reasonably good/Basic [[w:Intonation (linguistics)|intonation]]
<!-- Audio - Practice -->
# The narration is well/reasonably well practiced and/or performed
# The narration could benefit from further scripting and/or practice
<!-- Audio - Recording quality -->
# Audio recording quality was excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic/poor
# Recording volume was low
# Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality
# Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard and/or mouse clicks were audible). Consider using an external microphone.
<!-- Audio - Topic -->
# The narrated [[#Content|content]] is reasonably well matched to the target topic
# The narrated [[#Content|content]] lacked synthesis of the best psychological theory and research about this topic
|6=
<!-- Video comments ... -->
<!-- Video - Overall -->
# Overall, visual display quality is excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic
<!-- Video - Video, Image, Text -->
# The presentation makes creative/effective/very good/good/reasonably good/basic use of webcam, stock video, and/or animation
# The presentation makes effective/very good/good/reasonably good/basic use of text and image based slides
# The presentation makes basic use of text-based slides
<!-- Video - Text - Font -->
# The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
# Some of the font size could be larger to make it easier to read
# Using a [[w:sans-serif|sans-serif]] typeface would make the text easier to read
# Consider increasing line spacing to make the text easier to read
<!-- Video - Text - Amount -->
# The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time
# The amount of text presented on one or more slides could be reduced to make it easier to read and listen at the same time
# The presentation could be strengthened by including more text (e.g., take-home messages)
<!-- Video - Images -->
# The visual communication is supplemented in an excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic way by relevant images and/or diagrams
# The visual communication could be improved by including relevant images and/or diagrams
<!-- Video - Production -->
# The presentation is very well produced
# The presentation is well/reasonably well/basically produced using simple tools
<!-- Video - Topic -->
# The visual [[#Content|content]] is reasonably well matched to the target topic
# The visual [[#Content|content]] lacked synthesis of the best psychological theory and research about this topic
|7=
<!-- Meta-data comments ... -->
<!-- Meta-data - Title/sub-title -->
# The correct title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
# The correct title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. This would help to convey the purpose of the presentation and be consistent.
# The chapter sub-title but not the chapter title is used in the name of the presentation. This would help to convey the purpose of the presentation and be consistent.
# The video title does not match the chapter title and sub-title. This would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation and be consistent.
<!-- Meta-data - Description -->
# An excellent written description of the presentation is provided
# A very good/good/reasonably good written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
# A very brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand.
# Provide a written description of the presentation to help potential viewers
# Excellent/Very good/Good/Basic use of time codes
<!-- Meta-data - Links -->
# Links to and from the book chapter are provided
# An active hyperlink to the book chapter is provided
# An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided (maybe because the YouTube user account doesn't have [https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9890437 advanced features])
# A link to the book chapter is not provided
# A link from the book chapter is provided
# A link from the book chapter was not provided. I've added it.
|8=
<!-- Licensing comments ... -->
<!-- Licensing - Images -->
# Image sources and their copyright status are communicated
# Image sources are communicated in a general way
# Provide clickable links to the image sources and license details (e.g., in the description)
# Image sources and their copyright status are not clearly indicated
<!-- Licensing - Presentation -->
# A copyright license for the presentation is clearly indicated
# A copyright license for the presentation is in the description but not in the license field
# A copyright license for the presentation is not clearly indicated
}}
~~~~
creates: Multimedia presentation feedback
-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC) -- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:06, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |
