Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2025/Stockholm syndrome emotion

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings Under-developed, 1-level heading structure – develop further, perhaps using a 2-level structure for larger section(s) Adopt closer alignment between sub-title, more refined focus questions, and top-level headings 3. Overview Basic development Needs scenario Image added Needs evocative description of the problem/topic Focus questions lack development and focus 4. Key points Limited development of key points with relevant citations to the best psychological science about this topic 5. Figure One or more relevant figure(s) is/are presented and captioned The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1) 6. Learning feature One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Placeholder use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages Promising use of one or more table(s) Focus table content directly on the topic/question 7. References Very good All references need to be cited in the text Check and correct APA referencing style: italicisation 8. Resources See also Excellent External links One of two required relevant external links provided Target an international audience; Australians only represent 0.33% of the world population 9. User page Very good Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. 10. Social contribution Good – two out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence. The other type of contribution is making: comments on the talk pages of other chapters (past or current)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)