Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Work motivation and self-determination theory

Latest comment: 2 days ago by Annabelle Taylor in topic Suggested studies

Heading casing

edit
 
Hi U3212278. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:44, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

edit

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

 
  1. The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted
  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Basic, 1-level heading structure – could benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure
  3. Develop closer alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  4. Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
  1. Basic
  2. Add an image to the scenario to help attract reader interest
  3. A description of the problem/topic is planned
  4. Keep it simple
  5. Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended
  6. Open-ended focus questions are usually better than closed-ended (e.g., yes/no) questions
  1. Partial development of key points
  2. Basic use of citations
  3. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
  4. It is unclear whether the best available psychological theory and research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan
  5. Conclusion (the most important section) hasn't been developed
  6. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. One or more relevant figure(s) presented and captioned
  2. The figure caption(s) could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text
  3. Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1)
  1. Promising in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to relevant book chapters
  2. Basic use of scenario/example/case study
  3. Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages
  4. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  1. Good
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  3. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. Remove bullet-points
    2. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
  4. None
  1. See also
    1. Excellent
    2. Use sentence casing
  2. External links
    1. Excellent
    2. Use sentence casing
  1. Good
  2. Description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. A link to the book chapter is provided
  1. None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 03). Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see social contributions.
  2. To add direct links to evidence of Wikiversity edits or comments: view the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and paste the comparison URL on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions. This was demonstrated in tutorials.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Suggested studies

edit

Hey, here are some more studies to get the ball rolling with your chapter.


Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2024). Self-determination theory. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6229-6235). Cham: Springer International Publishing.


Legault, L. (2020). Self-determination theory. In Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 4694-4702). Cham: Springer International Publishing.


Howard, J. L., Bureau, J. S., Guay, F., Chong, J. X., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300-1323.


Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 61, 101860. Annabelle Taylor (discusscontribs) 02:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Return to "Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Work motivation and self-determination theory" page.