Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there! Great work on all the research you found on your topic, it was very interesting to read. Might I suggest adding some colour into your chapter with some colour text boxes? It might help make your chapter pop a little more to match the really interesting topic of depression and the role perfectionism plays! Good luck and I hope you receive a great mark :)
--Maddkilby (discuss • contribs) 13:00, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
Well developed 2-level heading structure, however too much preliminary content and too little directly on the topic. Avoid providing too much background information. Instead, briefly summarise generic concepts and provide internal wiki links to further information. Then the focus of most of the content can be on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
Other than what the title suggests, it also reflects on how self-comparison behaviour affects self-esteem and depressive symptoms in perfectionist individuals.
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn Canvas, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is a good chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
There is no need to focus in on MDD. The title and sub-title only specifies "depression", so keep the focus broader. The chapter adopts an unnecessarily narrow, clinical perspective.
For additional feedback, see comments below and these copyedits.
There is too much general theoretical material. Instead, summarise and link to further information, to allow this chapter to focus on the specific topic (i.e., the sub-title question).
Otherwise, relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained.
Relevant research is mentioned in relation to theory, but could be described in more detail.
When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
Greater emphasis on major reviews and meta-analyses would be helpful.
Overall, the chapter is reasonably well written, but there are also lots of aspects to be improved for it be of a professional standard.
The chapter benefited from a well developed Overview and Conclusion, with clear focus question(s) and take-home messages.
Layout
The chapter is reasonably well structured, but there should be less focus on the individual constructs and more focus on their relationship.
Learning features
For numbered lists, use Wikiversity formatting per Tutorial 1.
Very good use of interwiki links; also embed links to related book chapters.
Basic use of images. Consider adding photos.
No use of tables.
Basic use of feature boxes.
Basic use of quizzes.
The quiz questions could be more effective as learning prompts by being embedded as single questions within each corresponding section rather than being presented as a set of questions at the end.
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Canvas site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
Well selected content - not too much or too little.
Creativity presented content - 1st person narration worked really well.
Check and correct spelling errors (~00:50) and grammar (~02:40).
Explain abbreviations.
The presentation is well structured.
Consider adding and narrate an Overview slide (e.g., with focus questions), to help orientate the viewer about what will be covered. However, the first person example also worked well.
A Conclusion is presented with a take-home message(s).
Communicate the chapter title and sub-title in both the video title and on the opening slide this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
Audio recording quality was excellent.
Video recording quality was excellent.
Image sources are provided.
A copyright license for the presentation is not provided.
A copyright license for the presentation is provided in the video description but not in the meta-data.
A link to the book chapter is provided.
A link from the book chapter is provided.
A written description of the presentation is provided.