Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2016/Public speaking anxiety

Comments

Nice! I really like your chapter so far, it's very interesting from the get-go and very well written. Good work :) --U3117275 (discuss • contribs) 16:21, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

This looks really interesting! Can't wait to read it when it is done. Have you thought about using comparisons of stage fright to public speaking? It may help you to find useful sources. good luck!--JEMwarren (discuss • contribs) 09:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Hey, Interseting topic, can't wait to see how it comes along. I have provided a couple of links to Journal articles that may be helpful, one discusses the neural correlates of speech anticipatory anxiety and the other talks about exposure therapy as a means of overcoming it. Good luck with the chapter. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Samet_Kose/publication/8132932_Neural_correlates_of_speech_anticipatory_anxiety_in_generalized_social_phobia/links/00b7d523df5dcc5307000000.pdf http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03634520802450549--U3090066 (discuss • contribs) 19:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Good job, it looks great so far! Looking forward to reading the rest. Good luck!

Hi, it is really interesting topic.You have provided useful information. Public speaking is really diffucult but it is more diffucult who has a language barrier. I have provided for you a link about speaking and anxiety that you may find interesting. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1990.tb00424.x/full --Gamze101 (discuss • contribs) 23:25, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Linking key words

Hey just thought I would suggest adding some links to your key words like public speaking and anxiety, good luck!--JEMwarren (discuss • contribs) 10:19, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Heading casing

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings. For example, use: ==Cats and dogs== rather than ==Cats and Dogs== -- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:13, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a strong chapter which incorporates a balanced, critical review of relevant theory and research and makes effective use of the wiki environment. The chapter is over the maximum word count. For more feedback see these copyedits and the comments below. Feel free to make ongoing changes to the chapter if you wish to address any of these comments or make other improvements. Theory Overview Excellent. Body Several helpful examples or case studies were provided. Well-selected, critical focus on a range of relevant theories. Well integrated with discussion of research. Conclusion Offers a succint, clear, well-written summary. Research Several very useful/relevant research studies are described and synthesised with theory. When discussing important research findings, indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship. Written expression Written expression was very good. The chapter successfully addresses the topic and book theme. Structure and headings Each section should start with at least one introductory paragraph before branching into sub-sections. Avoid sections with only one sub-section. A section should have no sub-sections or at least two sub-sections. Add See also section. Layout Several images are used, but the chapter could be improved by making the captions more explanatory. Add bullet-points for See also and External links. Integration with other chapters No integration with other chapters is evident. Learning features Some use of interwiki links to relevant Wikipedia articles - more could be added. Quiz questions are used effectively to encourage reader engagement. Spelling Use Australian spelling (some general examples are hypothesize -> hypothesise; behavior -> behaviour). Grammar and proofreading Check and correct the use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's vs. individuals'). Check and correct the use of [1]abbreviations (such as "e.g.," and "i.e.,")]. APA style Check and correct the use of "&" vs. "and" (Use ampersand (&) inside brackets and "and" outside brackets). Check and correct the APA style formatting of in-text citations (et al.). Check and correct the APA style for how to report numbers (Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numbers (e.g., 10)). Put in-text citations in alphabetical order. The APA style for the reference list is very good; remove issue numbers for paginated journals.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a very well prepared and executed presentation. Structure and content Overview Effective. Selection and organisation Well selected content - not too much or too little. Well structured. Combines theory and research. Addresses a self-help theme. Uses examples. Include citations. References are included. Conclusion Take-home messages / key points are well summarised. Communication Audio Well narrated. Audio is clear and well-paced. Varied intonation added interest and engagement. Visuals The animated combination of images and text is effective in attracting and sustaining viewer attention. Production quality Overall, very well produced. Make it more widely available! (currently unlisted) Meta-data Well titled. Link to and from the book chapter provided. Minimal but sufficient use of the Description field. Audio recording quality Good - but remove the background music - it makes it more difficult to concentrate on the narration and visuals. Image/video recording quality Excellent Licensing A copyright license for the presentation is correctly shown in at least one location. Standard YouTube License. Also acknowledge the source of the images.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:49, 1 December 2016 (UTC)