Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2016/Polyamory and emotional need fulfillment
Compersion
editCheck out compersion. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:45, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Interesting! Thank you for that information--U3096943 (discuss • contribs) 11:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Comments
editHey Dana,
Was just having a quick read over your chapter - very informative and interesting, well done! Just noticed one thing with your referencing - You need to indent the second line of your references, so that they are "hanging". In the template that you would have originally used to get your chapter structure, their will be a little "box" in the reference section (you'll have to hover over it to see it) which already had the built in syntax so that your references are indented on the second line, so you can just add to that at they will "hang" automatically. Hannah :) --U3100481 (discuss • contribs) 00:45, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Heading casing
editFYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings. For example, use:
==Cats and dogs== |
Thanks James. --U3096943 (discuss • contribs) 02:19, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Comments
editHi, Interesting topic and your page looks great so far! I have shared a couple of contemporary articles that are hopefully helpful and may provide a slightly different perspective. The first article focuses on outsiders attitudes toward polygamy and a new assessment measure for assessing attitudes. The second focuses on sexual motivation and specifically female sexual motivation to engage in same-sex behaviors. Best of luck with the rest of your chapter, can't wait to see the finished product :) http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19419899.2014.1001774 http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-014-0462-4--U3090066 (discuss • contribs) 18:12, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi Dana. I think your chapter is really great! I really enjoyed the overview, which easily drew me in! I found each section logical and flowed on well to the next. I thought all your graphs and tables worked well and broke up the text. I thought the way you applied theories and model to the topic was good and you showed good critical thinking.(Something I could have improved on). I liked your images, especially at the end. I think you have done a really great job, especially in term of creating a space to reconsider preconceived ideas about polyamory. Pushed to suggest anything, maybe an image with some colour at the beginning. I was also wondering about interactive feature, (mainly because I didn't include one. and now I am kicking myself big time). The only other tiny thing is, in the overview I got tripped up a with the word "values" in the sentence starting... I had to read it a few times to see if you meant monogamous values or polyamory origins values.
Great job, I learnt a lot! Good luck Lorinda"
Structure
editI suggest avoiding having only a single sub-section within a section; either add another sub-section or merge the content into the higher level section. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:50, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Multimedia feedback
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. |
Overalledit
|
-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Chapter review and feedback
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements. |
Overalledit
|