Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Fascinating and promising chapter that is let down somewhat by a lack of proofreading, some structural issues, and that the chapter is over the maximum word-count.
For more feedback see these copyedits and the comments below.
Feel free to make ongoing changes to the chapter if you wish to address any of these comments or make other improvements.
The overall heading structure is probably too complicated (and the text too long), so look to reorganise more efficiently - e.g., the SDT / Autonomy / Competence / Related / Social factors sections could be better organised.
Layout
Tables and Figures should be referred to in the main text.
Check and correct Figure numbering
Integration with other chapters
The chapter provides a good range of relevant links to other Wikiversity pages in the See also section.
Learning features
Add Interwiki links (to relevant Wikipedia articles) to make the text more interactive.
Quiz questions are used effectively to encourage reader engagement.
Spelling
Use Australian spelling (some general examples are hypothesize -> hypothesise; behavior -> behaviour).
Spelling could be improved - see the [spelling?] tags.
Grammar and proofreading
Check and correct the use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's vs. individuals').
The grammar of some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags).
APA style
Check and correct the APA style for direct quotes.
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
Insert a brief Overview which sets up the problem to be solved (the question i.e., the subtitle for the book chapter).
Tell the listener what they will find out about if they watch this presentation.
Selection and organisation
Basic coverage of theory, but it needs to be more closely aligned to the topic - What are the affective aspects of physical literacy? - this topic is categorised and intended as an emotion topic (affect) but the presentation seems to focus more on motivations for physical exercise.
No coverage of research.
Include citations about for claims.
References are included.
Conclusion
None provided.
A Conclusion slide summarising the take-home messages / key points could be helpful.
Take-home messages / key points are well summarised.
Rename the title so that it includes the subtitle (and matches the book chapter).
Link to chapter provided.
Good use of the Description field to provide relevant information.
Audio recording quality
Good
Image/video recording quality
Trim the last few seconds off
Effective use of simple tools.
Licensing
The stated license in the description doesn't match the selected youtube license.
A copyright license for the presentation is correctly shown in at least one location. Standard YouTube License.
A copyright license for the presentation is correctly shown in at least one location. Creative Commons.
The copyright licenses and sources of the images used are not indicated - there may have been copyright violation unless you own the copyright to the images used.