Hi there, just had a look through your chapter: "Whichever suggested definition one selects, Zemach (2001) suggests that many theorists will fall into one of two opposing groups" this sentence is a little bit vague; perhaps you might consider rewording the first section to add some clarity? CheersU3117451 (discuss • contribs) 01:35, 15 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Hi there, You have a good outline of content but I think adding images will break up the text and make it easier and more inviting to read. You can do this going onto the wiki commons site https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page. simply search what you want an image of e.g hugging (to symbolise attachment), click on the image, copy the file name, go to your wikiversity book chapter, click insert>media>paste the file name>give it an APA style figure name. Hope this helps. :) I added one as an example. Hope this is okay U3115468 (discuss • contribs) 02:22, 16 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Hey,
Good start to your chapter, can't wait to see the end result. I completed some minor spelling and grammatical errors, best of luck with the rest of the chapter! --U3090066 (discuss • contribs) 17:43, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Hi again, I have re-read through your chapter and it is looking good. I fixed a few more grammar errors. One thing I would suggest is not to start sentences with things like "in which" as these are generally used mid-sentence and may confuse the reader. For example you have written "In which he identified five emotions; Enjoyment, Sadness, Anger, Fear, and Disgust." as a sentence on its own but it sounds incomplete. Just minor editing things. U3117451 (discuss • contribs) 02:42, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
"He also argued a difference between biologically inherent processes and learned processes." I would consider the relevance of this sentence as there is no follow up on why this is important information or how it relates to the rest of the content.
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is a basic, but sufficient chapter which could be improved by reducing general background theory, focusing more on the specific problem, synthesising rather than describing theory and research, improving the quality of written expression, and making greater use of the potential of the Wikiversity editing environment.
For more feedback see these copyedits and the comments below.
Feel free to make ongoing changes to the chapter if you wish to address any of these comments or make other improvements.
Abbreviate the general theoretical material (e.g., about emotion and about AT) and provide references and links to further information. This would allow more space to apply the theories to the specific topic (AT and emotion) in more detail. As it is, the section "Attachment type's influence on emotion" starts about half through the chapter - it should be the focus earlier.
More examples or case studies would be helpful.
Somewhat integrated with research.
Conclusion
Weak; could be improved by succintly summarising the key points and providing take-home self-help message which address the chapter's focus questions.
Several very useful/relevant research studies are described. They tend to be described one after the other. To improve the review of research, look for patterns and themes and try to synthesise the findings in order to convey a greater depth of understanding.
When describing important research studies, provide some indication of the nature of the method.
When discussing important research findings, indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
Some statements are unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)
Was the Bowlby (1958) source directly consulted? If not, don't cite it (or use a secondary citation).
The chapter somewhat addresses the topic and book theme but lacks practical take-home messages.
Structure and headings
The chapter is well-structured.
Layout
Add bullet-points for See also and External links.
Some images are used, but the chapter could be improved by adding more images and/or tables/feature boxes.
Tables and Figures should be referred to in the main text.
Some Figure captions could be improved by making them more explanatory.
Each section should start with at least one introductory paragraph before branching into sub-sections.
Integration with other chapters
Some integration with other chapters is evident.
Learning features
Some use of interwiki links to relevant Wikipedia articles - more could be added.
Quiz questions could be used to encourage reader engagement.
Grammar and proofreading
The grammar of some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags).
Check and correct use of commas (e.g., "For example" -> "For example, ").
APA style
Check and correct the use of "&" vs. "and" (Use ampersand (&) inside brackets and "and" outside brackets).
Check and correct the APA style for how to report numbers (Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numbers (e.g., 10)).
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.