Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is a basic chapter which could be improved by using more primary, peer-reviewed academic sources and paraphrasing less textbook material and making more use of the interactive features of a wiki environment.
For more feedback see these copyedits and the comments below.
A basic, cognitive description of empowerment is provided.
The description of self-efficacy could be improved and clarified.
In the Overview, perhaps a clear example of empowerment could be provided; as it is, it seems a bit wishy-washy, particularly with the lack of in-text citations.
More extensive use of examples and case studies could help to improve the explanation of theory.
The Reeve (2015) textbook is over-used as a citation; preferably consult and cite primary, peer-reviewed sources.
Some statements were unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)
Did you consult Ozer and Bandura (1990)? If not, don't cite it. I'm guessing that you didn't consult the original source and that the description of this study is paraphrased from the description in Reeve (2015).
When describing important research studies, provide some indication of the nature of the sample and possibly cultural context.
When discussing important research findings, indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The presentation could be improved by offering a more cogent description of empowerment, perhaps with examples. Without such information, it is difficult to much sense of the theoretical perspectives.
The definition provided of self-efficacy is somewhat different from typical descriptions.
Add more examples.
A Conclusion slide summarising the take-home messages / key points could be helpful.
