Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2015/Emotion elicition using film

Heading casing

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings. For example, use: ==Cats and dogs== rather than ==Cats and Dogs== -- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:07, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a well-prepared chapter. For more feedback see these copyedits and the comments below. Theory Theory behind emotion elicitation could be covered in more depth. Links to some example film clips (e.g., on youtube) would help to make the chapter more practical and interactive. Research Research is well covered. When describing important research studies, provide some indication of the nature of the sample and possibly cultural context. When discussing important research findings, indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship. Written expression Written expression was generally good. Avoid sections with only one sub-section. A section should have no sub-sections or at least two sub-sections. Layout See earlier comments about heading casing Several images are used; provide more elaborative/explanatory captions. Add bullet-points for See also and External links Learning features Interwiki links could be added (e.g., to relevant Wikipedia articles and other Wikiversity book chapters) to make the text more interactive. Quiz questions could be used to encourage reader engagement. Spelling Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize -> hypothesise) Grammar and proofreading The grammar of some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags) APA style The reference list is not in full APA style. Check and correct the APA style for how to report numbers (Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numbers (e.g., 10)). Put in-text citations in alphabetical order.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic, but sufficient presentation. Structure and content This a well structured overview. Citations? Measurements (spelling) Good conclusion. Useful examples. Communication Audio is clear and generally well-paced (perhaps slightly too fast in places). Visuals are clear and easy to read. The combination of images and text is effective. Production quality Audio is tinny/white noise - review microphone set-up. Music is OK for intro/end, but distracts from the voice/visuals. Fill out the description field (e.g., brief description of presentation, link back to the book chapter, license details, and possibly include references and image attributions) Description is minimal but sufficient. The copyright licenses and sources for the images used is not indicated - there may have been copyright violation unless you own the copyright to the images used or these were public domain images. A copyright license for the presentation is not indicated (e.g., in the description or in the presentation slides). No link is provided back to the book chapter.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:11, 26 November 2015 (UTC)