Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2014/Music and exercise motivation
Comments
editGreat topic! I always use music to motivate and push myself, without it I know I won't work as hard. Would be interesting to see if certain music genres are more likely to motivate than others? --JessicaClareHunt (discuss • contribs) 06:20, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
i think your topic sounds really interesting. i found some articles that may help you, this one talks about the intensity of music in relation to ht intensity of the workout, it also mentions differences between athletes preferred music intensity and just normal people http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/ehost/detail/detail?vid=16&sid=1ba90004-0dee-424a-94ff-34cf50c1c5fa%40sessionmgr4005&hid=4101&bdata=#db=pdh&AN=2013-43359-001. this article looks at the effects on music and exercise if you have the choice to listen to the music you want and like http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/ehost/detail/detail?vid=17&sid=1ba90004-0dee-424a-94ff-34cf50c1c5fa%40sessionmgr4005&hid=4101&bdata=#db=s3h&AN=82210840. hope this helps --Hynes08 (discuss • contribs) 03:26, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Interactive Activity Error Fixed
editThanks for the feedback and great resources. im just letting everyone know that the poll to see which genre people like most to use when exercising is fixed with an external link.
Heading casing
editFYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings. For example, use:
==Cats and dogs== |
Multimedia feedback
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process. |
OveralleditOverall, a good presentation. Well done. This appears to be the strongest element of the presentation. The structure is good. Research and theory are well integrated. The flow is logical, however the transition from one idea to the next could be more fluid (i.e. using linking sentences, rather than reading out each slide title). Less detailed content could be covered so as to more carefully emphasise and illustrate the key points. Communication is clear. The voice-over is too fast throughout, making the presentation feel rushed. Text on slides could have been larger. The presentation could be improved by writing a voice-over script which is separate to text on the slides. This would make it much more engaging. Incorporating more images would also be beneficial. Image quality is good. Audio quality is good, but there is a slight echo. Improving on some of the above points would help to give the presentation a more professional feel. No indication of copyright licence was provided. |
Chapter review and feedback
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements. |
Overalledit
|