Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2014/Monogamy motivation
Comments
editHi Alex i think this is a really great topic. you could possibly look into the theory that women like to stay in long term relationships more as opposed as they need someone to care and provide for their children and men would perhaps cheat more as they have to sow their seeds.--Hynes08 (discuss • contribs) 03:28, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi this looks great! I agree with the above comment, I've been learning about those theories in one of my other courses and I think it would be an interesting direction to take this in! look forward to reading it when its completed U3068859 (discuss • contribs) 07:36, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Hey, this is a really interesting chapter. I particularly like the discussion of the history of monogamy and how it slowly permeated Western culture until it was considered the norm. I thought the structure of your writing was easy to follow and developed well. One thing I would love to know more about is the studies you have mentioned in the 'Psychology' section. It would be relevant to the rest of your text if you mentioned when and where the studies were done, and how the data was collected - for example, did they ask a bunch of random people in the street or was this collected from marriage counselling or interviews etc. I love that you put in a link to the attachment style quiz - everyone likes quizzes! --U3090859 (discuss • contribs) 03:30, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Hey, i really enjoyed reading this chapter! it was an easy, yet stimulating read. i was significantly interested in your background research on religion and marriage as well as a contemporary and social look at monogamy. i also agree with the comment above mine about, as i would also like to know more about the studies you mentioned in the psychology section. if the studies mentioned are as interesting as your chapter it should result in a very captivating and informative read. Great Work and Good Luck
Layout
editHi, just suggesting taking all the information and making it more eye catching and appealing. Information is irrelevant if no attention is being payed. Some time should be spend on the layout of the information.
Heading casing
editFYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings. For example, use:
==Cats and dogs== |
APA referencing
editThe unit outline recommends that referencing be in APA style, even though it is a Wikipedia page! This means that instead of numbers, the author's surname and the publishing year should be in brackets; e.g. (Mead, 2014). All the details can be found here: http://canberra.libguides.com/content.php?pid=238252&sid=1966106 --U3090859 (discuss • contribs) 03:49, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Multimedia feedback
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process. |
Overalledit
|
RenaeLN (discuss • contribs) 07:13, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Chapter review and feedback
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements. |
Overalledit
|
-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)