Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2013/Delay of gratification

Heading casing

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings. For example, use: ==Cats and dogs== rather than ==Cats and Dogs== -- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:28, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall A great effort, you have produced a solid chapter. Theory The chapter covered lots of seminal theories, good job. For improvement, include some critique of the theories so as to provide a more balanced view Research The chapter clearly benefited from wide research, and it was certainly interesting to read. The chapter did contain some critical analysis regarding future directions and gaps in the literature, some critique of the studies themselves would be useful for future improvement Written expression The chapter was over all well written, good job. Some minor grammatical errors, be sure to thoroughly edit before submitting. The headings were correct, and the chapter had a good flow. The learning features were useful and made the chapter appealing. For future improvement, include an interactive feature such as a quiz. Solid effort with APA style, remember to italicise journal names and numbers, keep to APA style with figures and use et al., after first citation with 3 or more authors. Well done! Courtney.reis (discuss • contribs)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Overall Overall, a great effort. See comments below for feedback Structure and content The presentation had a logical flow and covered the key points of the chapter. There was a good balance and integration of research and theory The presentation would benefit from some inclusion of critique to help flow between theories. Communication The presentation was well paced and clear. There was some good use of images, to benefit the presentation in future it would be useful to include more visual aspects Production quality The quality of the production was good and the voiceover was clear. The presentation made effective use of basic tools, well done. Remember to include licensing information. I would recommend reshooting with the references over more slides to allow the reader to be able to see them. Great effort! Courtney.reis (discuss • contribs)