Complex Analysis/Application of Cauchy-Riemann Equations

Statement

edit

It is   an area,   holomorphic. If   is constant to  , then   is constant.

Proof

edit

It is open  ,   holomorphic. Other   constant.

Proof of Lemmas 1

edit

If   is constant to  , then also   must be constant with a constant  . If   is constant, the partial derivation   and  .

Proof of the Lemmas 2

edit

Because of   holomorphic on   the Cauchy-Riemannschen equations apply to

 

and

 

Proof of the Lemmas 3

edit

If   and   and application of the chain rule to the partial derivations are obtained the two equations

  and  

With CR-DGL   and  , the partial derivation of   is replaced by partial derivations of   and obtained (factor 2 can be omitted):

  and  

Proof of the Lemmas 4

edit

We square the two equations

 
 

and add these two squared equations to:

 

Proof of the Lemmas 5

edit

Clamping   and   gives:

 

This follows with the real-value component or Imaginary part functions in the product:

 

Proof of the Lemmas 6

edit
  •   and   are real-valued and with   the only option to fulfill the equation is   i.e.   and  . This implies that   is constant with  .
  • Similar to the argument above   implies   for the partial derivatives and  . With the application of the Cauchy-Riemann Equations and  
for  .

In both cases   is constant on  .

See also

edit


Page Information

edit

You can display this page as Wiki2Reveal slides

Wiki2Reveal

edit

The Wiki2Reveal slides were created for the Complex Analysis' and the Link for the Wiki2Reveal Slides was created with the link generator.

Translation and Version Control

edit

This page was translated based on the following Wikiversity source page and uses the concept of Translation and Version Control for a transparent language fork in a Wikiversity: