<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<doi_batch version="4.4.0" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.4.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.4.0 http://www.crossref.org/schema/deposit/crossref4.4.0.xsd">
<head>
<depositor>
<depositor_name>wkjm</depositor_name>
<email_address><span class="nowrap">Contact[[File:At sign.svg|alt=At sign|15px|@|link=]]WikiJMed.org</span></email_address>
</depositor>
<registrant>WEB-FORM</registrant>
</head>
<body>
<journal>
<journal_metadata>
<full_title>WikiJournal of Medicine/Comparison between the Lund-Browder chart and the BurnCase 3D® for consistency in estimating total body surface area burned</full_title>
<abbrev_title>Wiki.J.Med.</abbrev_title>
<issn media_type='electronic'>2002-4436 / 2470-6345 / 2639-5347</issn>
<doi_data>
<doi>10.15347/WJM</doi>
<resource>http://www.WikiJMed.org/</resource>
</doi_data>
</journal_metadata>
<journal_issue>
<publication_date media_type='online'>
<year>2020</year>
</publication_date>
<journal_volume>
<volume></volume>
</journal_volume>
<issue></issue>
</journal_issue>
<journal_article publication_type='full_text'>
<titles>
<title>Comparison between the Lund-Browder chart and the BurnCase 3D® for consistency in estimating total body surface area burned</title>
</titles>
<contributors>
<person_name sequence='first' contributor_role='author'>
<surname></surname>
</person_name>
</contributors>
<publication_date media_type='online'>
<year>2020</year>
</publication_date>
<doi_data>
<doi></doi>
<resource>https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Medicine/Comparison_between_the_Lund-Browder_chart_and_the_BurnCase_3D%C2%AE_for_consistency_in_estimating_total_body_surface_area_burned/XML</resource>
</doi_data>
</journal_article>
</journal>
<article>
<permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>[[File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg|11px|link=Wikipedia:Open Access]] [[File:Cc.logo.circle.svg|16px|link=Wikipedia:Creative Commons]]
This is an open access article distributed under the [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution License], which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
</p>
Objective: Measure time required to determine total body surface area (TBSA) burned (%TBSA) using the Lund-Browder chart and BurnCase 3D<sup>®</sup>, and calculate discrepancy between the two methods' %TBSA estimates. Methods: We asked 3 burn experts with 7 to 9 years of experience to participate in our experiment by estimating TBSA burned (%TBSA) for 26 subjects with a total of 262 photos, based on the Lund-Browder chart and the BurnCase 3D. We also measured time required for each estimation. Results: Estimations via the Lund-Browder chart and the BurnCase 3D showed statistically significant differences for Observers 1 and 2 (p < 0.05), but not for Observer 3 (p = 0.11). Inter-observer variability was insignificant among the observers (p = 0.31). When using the BurnCase 3D, burn estimation was consistent across the 3 participants (p = 0.31), yet the time spent for each method was significantly different (p < 0.05) from using the Lund-Browder chart and the time spent for estimation did not statistically vary (p = 0.20). Time spent on burn estimation varied when using either the Lund-Browder chart or the BurnCase 3D for all participants (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Using the BurnCase 3D over the Lund-Browder chart produced slightly different estimations for TBSA burned but estimation results stayed stable across inspectors. Due to the small sample size however, further investigation is necessary.
</p>
</abstract>
</article>
</body>
</doi_batch>