Talk:WikiJournal Preprints/Induced stem cells

Talk:WikiJournal Preprints/Induced stem cells

Plagiarism check

 Comment Report from WMF copyvios tool: The main issue is the similarity with the Gladstone Institutes news article, where paraphrasing is sufficiently close that it would be best to rephrase the section on transdifferentiation by 9C. Similarities with other websites are merely common phrases, or reuse by others of content from this article, so do not constitute a problem. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)^talk 04:50, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Peer Review 1

Review by Dr Vishnu Sri Priya J , Mahe Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital
add this statement to wikidata
These assessment comments were submitted on 27 Feb 2023, and refer to this previous version of the article

Well drafted and innovative. Could have added more illustrations to make it attractive to the readers.

Treenxorr (discuss • contribs) 11:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Submission rejected

Comments by Andrew Leung ,
These editorial comments were submitted on 18 Jun 2024, and refer to this previous version of the article

The text in this manuscript has been identified as suspected copyright violation and reference false attribution (see here for discussion). As such, I am rejecting this submission for further consideration. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 20:15, 18 June 2024 (UTC)