Talk:United States Law/Constitutional

Splitting this Course

Hi all, I have a couple thoughts on the overall organization of this course. Many law schools split Constitutional Law into several different courses: Constitutional Law I (covering judicial review, federalism, and powers of the federal government); Constitutional Law II (covering individual rights); and Criminal Procedure (covering the constitutional rights of criminal defendants).

I believe it would be worthwhile to split this course in a similar way, so as to ensure there is enough time to go in sufficient depth.

Let me know! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minivanburen (talk • contribs) 7 March 2018 (UTC)

@Minivanburen: -- Be bold! -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 17:41, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

@Dave Braunschweig: -- Thanks! I've begun updating and restructuring this course, though obviously a full syllabus and course book will take a fair amount of time. Once I make my way through this I will begin work on the other two courses. Help is, of course, always appreciated. Regards. --Minivanburen (discuss • contribs) 21:57, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

@Minivanburen: Based on your own experience, whatever you can add will be helpful. It's not my area of expertise, but if you have wiki questions, please let me know. Thanks! -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 22:23, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

A quick suggestion, With standing, we include Hollingsworth v. Perry as a case to look over and or brief. Modifies the standard set in Lujan from a temporal standard, to who has agency. --WhiteKnightSTU