Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2013/Motivation and hazing

Hi there

I found this article that might be useful to you

Honeycutt, C. (2005). Hazing as a process of boundary maintenance in an online community. Journal Of Computer Mediated Communication.10.

Saerah (discuss • contribs) 15:43, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall What a fascinating chapter, well done! Theory The chapter had a broad coverage of theories, and looked at each in an appropriate amount of depth, well done. There was fantastic evidence of critical analysis, this was lovely to see. For future improvement, apply critical analysis to all chapters, this is an invaluable skill to have Research The chapter clearly benefited from wide and relevant research, well done. The integration of theory and research was a particular strength. There was some evidence of critical analysis of research, this is an area in which the chapter can benefit in future. Great work! Written expression The chapter was generally well written, well done. There was some grammatical error throughout, thoroughly editing before submission can be useful. The learning features were fantastic, I particularly liked the drop down bars with areas for support and prevention. For future improvement, perhaps include another interactive feature such as a quiz. The APA style was solid, a fantastic effort!Courtney.reis (discuss • contribs)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Overall A great attempt, see feedback below for comments. Structure and content The presentation had good coverage of all the theories included as well as where to go for help – good job. For future improvement include more of the research studies included in the chapter. Communication The presentation made good use of images, well done. The presentation was very rapid, and this made it hard to follow at times. For future improvement, perhaps include a case study or more images to make it more engaging for the viewer Production quality The quality of the presentation was good, and as above the audio though clear was very rapid. However, the presentation made good use of basic tools, well done. Remember to include licensing information. Good effort! Courtney.reis (discuss • contribs)