Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Generativity

Generativity:
What is generativity and how does it impact behaviour and life outcomes?
Replace the link in the box above once the multimedia presentation has been published.

Overview

edit
 
Figure 1. Explore the topic, then brainstorm a structure.

need an example of the topic

feature box. The feature box colour can be changed by:
  1. Edit source
  2. Change theme=3 to another number

what is generativy?


Erik Erikson introduced the psychoanalytical notion of generativity, as a cornerstone for adult development during middle age. Drawing on theoretical grounding, cross-cultural variation in generative behaviors and its implications over high school years are illustrated through the chapter. The conversation moves into generativity and how it pertains to different stages, as well as what encourages or discourages the process. The chapter will detail generativity, measuremonthedods for it as well significant a research literature on these issues.

Key points

edit
    1. Erikson’s Theory: Generativity is a key stage in Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development, where individuals focus on contributing to society and helping to guide the next generation (Erikson, 1950).
    2. Lifespan Perspective: Generativity is not limited to middle adulthood but can manifest across different life stages (McAdams & de St. Aubin, 1992).
    3. Cultural Variation: The expression of generativity varies significantly across cultures, influenced by societal norms and values (Cheng, 2014).
    4. Measurement: Various scales and methods, such as the Loyola Generativity Scale, have been developed to measure generative concern and action (McAdams, 1994).
    5. Barriers to Generativity: Psychological issues, socioeconomic factors, and cultural contexts can act as barriers to the development of generativity (Grossman & Gruenewald, 2017).

  Suggestions for this section:

  • Engage the reader with a scenario, example, or case study, and an accompanying image
  • Explain the problem and why it is important
  • Outline how psychological science can help
  • Present focus questions

Focus questions: Break the problem (i.e., the sub-title) down into three to five focus questions. Focus questions can also be used as top-level headings.

  • What is the first focus question?
  • What is the second focus question?
  • What is the third focus question?

Ask open-ended focus questions. For example:

  • Is there a relationship between motivation and success? (closed-ended)  
  • What is the relationship between motivation and success? (open-ended)  

Introduction to Generativity

edit

Theoretical Foundations of Generativity

edit

Erikson’s Theory of Psychosocial Development

edit
Extensions and Critiques of Erikson’s Model
edit

Generativity Across the Lifespan

edit

Generativity in Early Adulthood

edit

Generativity in Middle Adulthood

edit
Generativity in Late Adulthood
edit

Cultural and Societal Impacts of Generativity

edit

Generativity in Different Cultures

edit

The Role of Generativity in Social Change

edit

The Measurement of Generativity

edit

Methods and Tools for Assessing Generativity

edit

Key Findings from Research Studies

edit

Applications of Generativity in Everyday Life

edit

Generativity in Parenting and Family Life

edit

Generativity in Work and Community Involvement

edit

Challenges and Barriers to Generativity

edit

Factors Inhibiting Generative Behaviors

edit

Psychological and Social Interventions

edit

Figures

 
Figure 2. Example of an image with a descriptive caption.
    • Figure 1: A diagram illustrating Erikson’s stages of psychosocial development with a focus on generativity versus stagnation.
    • Figure 2: A cultural comparison chart showing the expression of generativity in different societies.


Learning features

Case Study: Analysis of a real-life individual or community that demonstrates high levels of generativity, including interviews and personal reflections.

Scenarios
  • Scenarios or case studies describe applied/real-world examples of concepts in action
  • Case studies can be real or fictional
  • A case study could be split into multiple boxes throughout a chapter (e.g., to illustrate different theories or stages)
  • It is often helpful to present case studies using feature boxes.

Feature boxes
  • Important content can be highlighted in a feature box. But don't overuse feature boxes, otherwise they lose their effect.
  • Consider using feature boxes for:
    • Scenarios, case studies, or examples
    • Focus questions
    • Tips
    • Quiz questions
    • Take-home messages
Embedded links
  • When key words are introduced, use interwiki links to:
    • Wikipedia articles (e.g., "An early psychological view dreams) of dreams was provided by Sigmund Freud".)
    • Related book chapters (e.g., "If you're feeling stuck, check out the chapter about writer's block".)
Tables
  • Use to organise and summarise information
  • Tables should be captioned
  • Refer to each table at least once in the main text (e.g., see Table 1)
  • Example 3 x 3 tables which could be adapted

Table 1. Descriptive Caption Which Explains The Table and its Relevant to the Text - Johari Window Model

Known to self Not known to self
Known to others Open area Blind spot
Not known to others Hidden area Unknown
Quizzes
  • Using one or two revision questions per major section is better than a long quiz at the end
  • Quiz conceptual understanding, rather than trivia
  1. The best quiz questions are about important information take-home messages
  • The best quiz questions are simple rather than hard
  • Different types of quiz questions are possible; see Quiz

Example simple quiz questions. Choose your answers and click "Submit":

1 Quizzes are an interactive learning feature:

True
False

2 Long, complex quiz questions are a good idea:

True
False


Conclusion: The Future of Generativity in Human Development

edit
  • The Conclusion is arguably the most important section
  • Suggested word count: 150 to 330 words
  • It should be possible for someone to only read the Overview and the Conclusion and still get a pretty good idea of the problem and what is known based on psychological science

  Suggestions for this section:

  • What is the answer to the sub-title question based on psychological theory and research?
  • What are the answers to the focus questions?
  • What are the practical, take-home messages? (Even for the topic development, have a go at the likely take-home message)

See also

edit
  1. Wikipedia: Developmental psychology/Chapter 13/Generativity: The Work of Adulthood
  2. Wikiversity: Developmental Psychology

  Suggestions for this section:

  • Present in alphabetical order
  • Use sentence casing
  • Include the source in parentheses

References

edit
  1. Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. Norton.
  2. McAdams, D. P., & de St. Aubin, E. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 1003-1015.
  3. Cheng, S. (2014). Generativity in cultural context: A comparison of American and Chinese adults. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(3), 481-496.
  4. McAdams, D. P. (1994). The generative society: Caring for future generations. American Psychological Association.
  5. Grossman, M. R., & Gruenewald, T. L. (2017). The role of generativity in successful aging: Development, factors, and interventions. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 37(1), 45-71.
  6. de St. Aubin, E., McAdams, D. P., & Kim, T.-C. (2004). The generative society: Caring for future generations. American Psychological Association.

  Suggestions for this section:

  • Wrap the set of references in the hanging indent template:
    • Use "Edit source"
    • {{Hanging indent|1= the full list of references}}
  • Style
    • Author surname, followed by a comma, then the author initials separated by full stops and spaces
    • Year of publication in parentheses
    • Title of work in lower case except first letter and proper names, ending in a full-stop
    • Journal title in italics, volume number in italics, issue number in parentheses, first and last page numbers separated by an en-dash(–), followed by a full-stop
    • Provide the full doi as a URL and working hyperlink
  • The most common mistakes include:
    • Incorrect capitalisation
    • Incorrect italicisation
    • Citing sources that weren't read or consulted

edit
  1. American Psychological Association: Generativity and Aging
  2. Harvard University: The Science of Generativity

  Suggestions for this section:

  • Only select links to major external resources about the topic
  • Present in alphabetical order
  • Include the source in parentheses after the link