Wikiversity

Evidence-based assessment/Instruments/Strength and difficulties questionnaire

< Evidence-based assessment | Instruments

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a behavioral screening questionnaire for children and adolescents ages 2 through 17 years old, developed by child psychiatrist Robert Goodman in the United Kingdom. Versions of it are available for use for no fee. The combination of its brevity and noncommercial distribution have made it popular among clinicians and researchers. There are more than 3000 peer reviewed articles using it that are indexed in PubMed alone. Overall, the SDQ has been proven to have satisfactory construct and concurrent validity across a wide range of settings and samples.[1][2][3] It is considered a good general screening measure for attention problems,[4] although the sensitivity and specificity are not both over .80 at any single cut score, so it should not be used by itself as the basis for a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.[5]

Click Here for Landing Page
Click Here for Landing Page
HGAPS New for Fall 2022: HGAPS and Psychology Conferences
Click Here for Landing Page
Click Here for Landing Page

HGAPS is finding new ways to make psychological science conferences more accessible!

Here are examples from APA 2022 and the JCCAP Future Directions Forum. Coming soon... ABCT!
~ More at HGAPS.org ~


Wikipedia has more about this subject: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

There are versions of the SDQ designed for use in different situations, including a short form, a longer form with an impact supplement, and a follow-up form designed for use after a behavioral intervention. The questionnaire takes 3–10 minutes to complete. There are now self-report (completed by the youth), parent-report, and teacher-report versions. A version designed for adults (age 18+ years) to fill out about themselves has also been developed. The SDQ has been translated into more than 80 languages, including Spanish, Chinese, Russian, and Portuguese.[6]

General population norms are available for the USA and UK for some of the variations of the SDQ.

Scoring and interpretation

edit

Respondents are asked to indicate whether a specific attribute is “not true”, “somewhat true”, or “certainly true”. There are four versions of the short form:

  • Three parent/teacher versions for children ages 2–4, 4-10, and 11-17,
  • One self-report version for children ages 11–17.

Scores on the attributes section range from 0-40, with prosocial behavior scale scores not included in the total score. All versions of the SDQ ask 25 questions sorted into 5 scales. Four of these are potential problems, and one is strength-related.

Subscale
(rated 0-2 for each question, maximum score of 10)		 Score and description Notes
Emotional symptoms subscale
(Questions 1-5)		 Parent report:
0-3: Normal behavior
4: Borderline abnormal behavior
5-10: Abnormal behavior		 Teacher report:
0-4: Normal behavior
5: Borderline abnormal behavior
6-10: Abnormal behavior
Conduct problems subscale
(Questions 6-10)		 Parent or Teacher report:
0-2: Normal behavior
3: Borderline abnormal behavior
4-10: Abnormal behavior		 Question 7 reverse scored*
Hyperactivity/inattention subscale
(Questions 11-15)		 Parent or Teacher report:
0-5: Normal behavior
6: Borderline abnormal behavior
7-10: Abnormal behavior		 Questions 14 and 15 reverse scored*
Peer relationship problems subscale
(Questions 16-20)		 Parent report:
0-2: Normal behavior
3: Borderline abnormal behavior
4-10: Abnormal behavior		 Teacher report:
0-3: Normal behavior
4: Borderline abnormal behavior
5-10: Abnormal behavior		 Questions 17 and 18 reverse scored*
Prosocial behavior subscale
(Questions 21-25)		 Parent or Teacher report:
6-10: Normal behavior
5: Borderline abnormal behavior
0-4: Abnormal behavior
Internalizing score
(summing emotional symptoms and peer relationship problems)		 Not available
Externalizing score
(summing conduct problems and hyperactivity/inattention)		 Not available
Total score
(summing scores from questions 1-20)		 Parent report:
0-13: Normal behavior
14-16: Borderline abnormal behavior
17 and above: Abnormal behavior		 Teacher report:
0-11: Normal behavior
12-15: Borderline abnormal behavior
15 and above: Abnormal behavior
  • *Reverse scoring means that responses of “not true” receive 2 points, responses of “somewhat true” receive 1 point, and responses of “certainly true” receive 0 points.

Other scoring

edit

The same 25 items are included in questionnaires for completion by the parents or teachers of 4- to 16-year-olds.[7]

A slightly modified informant-rated version for the parents or nursery teachers of 2- to 4-year-olds. 22 items are identical, the item on reflectiveness is softened, and 2 items on antisocial behavior are replaced by items on oppositionality.

Questionnaires for self-completion by adolescents ask about the same 25 traits, though the wording is slightly different as it is in the first person (e.g. 'I often worry' instead of 'Many worries, often seems worried'). This self-report version is suitable for young people aged around 11-17, depending on their level of understanding and literacy.

B. An impact supplement

edit

Several two-sided versions of the SDQ are available with the 25 items on strengths and difficulties on the front of the page and an impact supplement on the back. These extended versions of the SDQ ask whether the respondent thinks the young person has a problem, and if so, enquire further about chronicity, distress, impairment in everyday activities, and burden to others. This provides useful additional information for clinicians and researchers with an interest in psychiatric caseness and the determinants of service use.[8]

C. Follow-up questions

edit

The follow-up versions of the SDQ include not only the 25 basic items and the impact question, but also two additional follow-up questions for use after an intervention of after visits to a clinic:

  1. How have the intervention / clinic visits changed the child's problems?
  2. Has the intervention helped in other ways, e.g. making the problems more bearable?

To increase the chance of detecting change, the follow-up versions of the SDQ ask about 'the last month', as opposed to 'the last six months or this school year', which is the reference period for the standard versions. Follow-up versions also omit the question about the chronicity of problems.

How to score the SDQ

edit

The SDQ scoring site allows one to score paper copies of a parent, teacher and/or self-report SDQ free-of-charge, and generates a brief report. Briefly, each of the five scales of the SDQ are scored from 0-10, and one can add up four of these (emotional, conduct, hyperactivity and peer problems) to create a total difficulty score (range 0-40).[7] One can also add the emotional and peer items together to get an internalizing problems score (range 0-20) and add the conduct and hyperactivity questions together to get an externalizing score (range 0-20).

edit
  Subject classification: this is a psychology resource.

References

edit
  1. ↑ Stone, Lisanne L.; Otten, Roy; Engels, Rutger C. M. E.; Vermulst, Ad A.; Janssens, Jan M. A. M. (2010-09-01). "Psychometric Properties of the Parent and Teacher Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for 4- to 12-Year-Olds: A Review". Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 13 (3): 254–274. doi:10.1007/s10567-010-0071-2. ISSN 1096-4037. PMID 20589428. PMC 2919684. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2919684/. 
  2. ↑ Goodman, R.; Meltzer, H.; Bailey, V. (1998-10-01). "The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A pilot study on the validity of the self-report version". European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 7 (3): 125–130. doi:10.1007/s007870050057. ISSN 1018-8827. 
  3. ↑ Warnick, Erin M.; Bracken, Michael B.; Kasl, Stanislav (September 2008). "Screening Efficiency of the Child Behavior Checklist and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Systematic Review". Child and Adolescent Mental Health 13 (3): 140–147. doi:10.1111/j.1475-3588.2007.00461.x. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2007.00461.x. 
  4. ↑ Owens, J. S., Evans, S. W., & Margherio, S. M. (2020). Assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. In E. A. Youngstrom, M. J. Prinstein, E. J. Mash, & R. Barkley (Eds.), Assessment of Disorders in Childhood and Adolescence (5th ed., pp. 93-131). Guilford Press.
  5. ↑ Mulraney, Melissa; Arrondo, Gonzalo; Musullulu, Hande; Iturmendi-Sabater, Iciar; Cortese, Samuele; Westwood, Samuel J.; Donno, Federica; Banaschewski, Tobias et al. (2022-08). "Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Screening Tools for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents". Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 61 (8): 982–996. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2021.11.031. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0890856721020840. 
  6. ↑ "Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire". Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Retrieved 10 July 2015.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 Goodman, R., The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 1997. 38(5): p. 581-6
  8. ↑ Goodman, R., The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 1999. 40(5): p. 791-9.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Evidence-based_assessment/Instruments/Strength_and_difficulties_questionnaire&oldid=2424135"