Complex Analysis/Identity Theorem
The Identity Theorem is a statement about holomorphic functions, asserting that they are uniquely determined under relatively weak conditions.
Statement
editLet be a domain. For two holomorphic functions , the following are equivalent:
(1) (i.e., for all )
(2) There exists a such that for all .
(3) The set has a limit point in .
Proof
editBy considering , we may assume without loss of generality that . Equivalently, the proof is reduced to showing the following three statements:
- (N1) (i.e., for all )
- (N2) There exists a such that for all .
- (N3) The zero set has a limit point in .
Proof Type
editThe equivalence is proven using a cyclic implication:
Proof (N1 to N2)
edit(N1) (N2) is obvious, as all derivatives of the zero function are zero.
Proof (N2 to N3)
editAssume (N2). Consider the power series expansion in with . Here, for all . Thus, , and (N3) follows.
Proof (N3 to N1) – Contradiction Proof
editThe step (N3) (N1) is proven by contradiction. Assume the zero set has a limit point and is not the zero function.
Proof 1 - (N3 to N1) - Power Series Expansion at Limit Point
editAssume (N3), i.e., the set of zeros of has a limit point . Thus, there exists a sequence with and as well as for all . Let be the power series expansion of around .
Proof 2 - (N3 to N1) - Power Series Expansion
editSuppose there exists with . Due to the well-ordering property of , there would also be a smallest such . Then
Proof 3 - (N3 to N1) - Power Series Evaluation
editFor each , we have
Proof 4 - (N3 to N1) - Limit Process
editSince and , we get
As for all as . This contradicts . Therefore, for all , and hence for all , i.e., (N2) holds.
Proof 5 - (N3 to N1) - V is Closed
editIf (N2) holds, set . is closed in as the intersection of closed sets, because the are continuous, and preimages of closed sets (here ) are closed.
Proof 6 - (N3 to N1) - V is Open
editis also open in , as for every , the power series expansion of around vanishes. Thus, is locally zero around . Since , is non-empty, and hence due to the connectedness of .
Proof 7 - From (N1)-(N3) to (1)-(3)
editThe statement of the Identity Theorem (1)-(3) follows for arbitrary and , by applying (N1)-(N3) to .
See Also
editPage Information
editThis learning resource can be presented as a Wiki2Reveal slides
Wiki2Reveal
editThe Wiki2Reveal slides were created for the Complex Analysis' and the Link for the Wiki2Reveal Slides was created with the link generator.
- Identity TheoremThis page] was created as is document type PanDocElectron-SLIDE .
Translation and Version Control
editThis page was translated based on the following Wikiversity source page and uses the concept of Translation and Version Control for a transparent language fork in a Wikiversity:
- Source: Kurs:Funktionentheorie/Identitätssatz - URL: https://de.wikiversity.org/wiki/Kurs:Funktionentheorie/Identitätssatz
- Date: 12/17/2024