Complex Analysis/Cauchy Integral Theorem

Introduction

edit

The Cauchy integral theorem is one of the central results of Complex Analysis. It exists in various versions, and in this article, we aim to present a basic one for convex regions and a relatively general one for nullhomologous cycles.

For Convex Regions

edit

Statement

edit

Let   be a convex region, and let   be a closed rectifiable curve Trace of Curve in  . Then, for every holomorphic function  , the following holds:

 

Proof 1: Antiderivatives of f

edit

First, we observe that   has a antiderivative in  . Fix a point  . For any point  , let   denote the straight-line segment connecting   and   as path.

Proof 2: Definition of the Antiderivative

edit

Define   by:

 .

Due to the convexity of  , the triangle   with vertices   lies entirely within   for  .

Proof 3: Application of Goursat’s Lemma

edit

By Goursat's Lemma for the boundary   of a triangle   with vertices  , we have:

 

Proof 4: Conclusion Using Goursat's Lemma

edit

This leads to:

 

Thus, we have:

 

Proof 5: Limit Process

edit

Since   is continuous in  , taking the limit as   gives:

 

Proof 5: Differentiability of  

edit

Therefore,   is continuous, and   is differentiable in  , with:

 

Since   was arbitrary, we conclude  , proving that   has a antiderivative.

Proof 6: Path Integration

edit

Now, let   be a piecewise continuously differentiable, closed curve. Then:

 

Proof 7:

edit

Let   be an arbitrary integration path in  , and let  . As shown here, we choose a polygonal path   such that  ,  , and

 

Since polygonal paths are piecewise continuously differentiable, the above result implies  . Consequently,

 

As   was arbitrary, the claim follows.

For Cycles in Arbitrary Open Sets

edit

In arbitrary open sets, one must ensure that cycles do not enclose singularities or poles in the complement of the domain. Enclosing such singularities may contribute a non-zero value to the integral (e.g., the function   and   in a domain   . Even though   is holomorphic in  , the integral is not zero but   (see nullhomologous cycle).

Statement

edit

Let   be open, and let   be a nullhomologous cycle in  . Then, for every holomorphic function  , the following holds:

 

Proof

edit

Let  , and define   by

 

Then,   is holomorphic, and by the global integral formula, we have:

 

See Also

edit

Page Information

edit

You can display this page as Wiki2Reveal slides

Wiki2Reveal

edit

The Wiki2Reveal slides were created for the Complex Analysis' and the Link for the Wiki2Reveal Slides was created with the link generator.

Translation and Version Control

edit

This page was translated based on the following von Cauchy Wikiversity source page and uses the concept of Translation and Version Control for a transparent language fork in a Wikiversity: