# Astronomy college course/Why planets lose their atmospheres

*Subpages* Quiz Quiz answers explained

This discussion combines ideas taken from two Wikipedia pages^{[1]} ^{[2]}and one Wikiversity page^{[3]}.
The purpose of this learning resource is to show how calculations can be used to gain insight into complex phenomena such as the ability of a planet to retain an atmosphere. From the numbers alone, it is possible to see evidence of recent volcanism on Venus and Triton. And it is possible to understand why we are confident that a meteorite found on Earth actually came from Mars. All by looking at numbers and equations!

**Atmospheric escape** is the loss of planetary atmospheric gases to outer space. We shall focus first on atmospheric escape due to thermal particles exceeding the escape velocity. In order to do so, we shall borrow from the Wikipedia article **Effective temperature** to construct a table of nominal temperatures of the planets based solely on the distance from the planet or moon from the Sun. This table facilitates an understanding of why the Argon isotope ratio on Mars differs from that of the Sun, Earth, and Jupiter. A few of the other mechanisms by which planets and moons lose or retain their atmosphere are briefly outlined.

## Potential energy and Kinetic energy edit

## Energy edit

**Energy is stored work. It has the same units as work, the Joule (J).**

There are many forms of energy:

**Spring energy**: Work has been done on a spring to compress or stretch it; the spring has the ability to push or pull on another object and do work on it. The force required to stretch a spring is proportional to the distance it is stretched: F = kx where x is the stretch distance and k is a constant characteristic of the spring (big heavy springs have larger k values).
The work done in stretching a spring from 0 to x is the integral of dW = Fdx.
Since the force function is linear, we can just take the average force of kx/2 and avoid using calculus:

W = average F x distance = (kx/2)(x) = ½kx²

Assuming 100% efficiency, the energy stored in a stretched spring is the same as the work done in stretching it, so **Spring E = ½kx²**

Example: How much energy is stored in a spring with k = 2000 N/m that has been stretched 1 cm away from its equilibrium length?

E = ½kx² = ½(2000)(0.01)² = 0.1 J

**Gravitational potential energy**: a mass has been lifted to a height; when released it will be pulled down by gravity and can do work on another object as it falls.

Example: Find the energy stored in a tonne of water at the top of a 20 m high hydroelectric dam.

The long way is to use F = mg and then W = Fd to find the work needed to lift the water up.

The short way is to combine the formulas, replacing F with mg and using h (height) in place of d:

Gravitational energy = W = Fd = mgh

E_{gravity} = mgh = (1000 kg)(9.81 m/s²)(20 m) = 196200 kg m²/s² = 1.96 x 10^{5} J

**Kinetic energy**: A mass is moving and can do work when it hits another object.
E_{kinetic} = ½mΔV^{2} = ½m(V_{f}^{2}-V_{i}^{2})

Example: A 8kg ball is moving at 5m/s.
E_{K} = ½(8 kg)(5 m/s)^{2} = 200 J.

**Electrical energy**: Electrons can flow out of a battery or capacitor and do work on another electrical component such as a light bulb.

## Escape velocity edit

**What goes up does not necessarily go down.** If an object is thrown upward it never returns to the planet from which it was thrown. A good rule of thumb is

- ,

where

*G*= 6.67×10_{Newton}^{−11}_{}m^{3}·kg^{−1}·s^{−2}is Newton's universal constant of gravitation*r*is the radius of the planet (or the height from which the projectile is directed)_{planet}*M*is the mass of the planet_{planet}*m*is the mass of the atom_{atom}*v*is the critical speed of an upward directed atom called the_{escape}*escape velocity*. If the speed is less than*v*, the atom returns. If the speed is greater than_{escape}*v*, the atom does not return._{escape}

This formula only applies to objects thrown directly upward. Objects thrown at other angles might go into an orbit and require a slightly different formula, but for our purposes this is good enough. Note that the mass of the atom cancels, which means that the critical velocity for escape does not depend on the mass: A massive rocket launched into space has the same escape velocity as an individual atom. This extra factor (*m _{atom}*) could have been omitted from the formula, but its inclusion makes it easier for physics majors to understand that this is an energy conservation argument. The left hand side of the above equation is the initial kinetic energy, and the right hand side the gain in potential energy as the particle "rises" to an infinite height.

### Thermal energy edit

Atoms in a gas or atmosphere do not all move at the same speed, but instead follow the so-called "Bell curve" (properly called a normal or Gaussian distribution). The formula for the average component of a squared speed (see root mean square, , in any direction is also easy to remember if you think about energy:

- ,

where Boltzmann's constant is k_{B} ≈ 1.38 × 10^{-23} Joules/degree. (Like G, k_{B} is a universal constant of nature that we assume to be constant everywhere and for all time.) This equation is a well known formula from a theoretical analysis of the ideal gas developed at by Maxwell and Boltzmann in 1860-1877.

### Defining an "escape" temperature edit

It is convenient to define a "escape temperature" for any planet as that temperature for which an average thermal molecule has the escape velocity. While the actual temperature of a planet is typically much less than this "escape temperature", the ratio of "escape temperature" to actual temperature is an indicator of how well the planet can retain its atmosphere. The "escape temperature" is obtained by eliminating *speed* as a variable in the above two equations. Before we combine the equations, it is convenient to think about **radius-and-density** instead of **radius-and-mass**. The density, , (or mass density) is mass divided by volume. Using a well-known formula for the radius of a sphere, the mass, M, and radius, r, of a planet are related by,

- .

Setting equal to and solving yeilds:

The physical significance of is that if a planet has this temperature, the average molecule in the atmosphere will has enough speed to escape from the planet. It is constructive to compare this critical temperature with the actual temperature of the planet.

### Handy units edit

This is a wonderful formula if you happen to be a human calculating machine. The rest of us need to convert this formula into more "handy" units. This is accomplished by taking convenient values for as many variables as we can. Using values taken from wikipedia,

*R*= 6.37×10_{planet}^{6}m (meters) = the radius of Earth*M*= 5.97×10_{planet}^{24}kg (kilograms)= the mass of Earth*m*= 1.66×10_{atom}^{-27}kg (kilograms) = 1 AMU ≈ mass of proton or neutron*ρ*_{water}= 1 gm/cm^{3}= 1000 kg/m^{3}.

Using these values, we calculate the critical temperature to be 2736 Kelvins. This is astonishingly high, but a planet with this critical temperature would lose all it's atmosphere immediately. Remember that any planet that loses 0.1% of its atmosphere each year due to gravitational escape would lose its atmosphere in a few thousand years.

The use of convenient numbers to calculate this effective temperature is useful because it can be used to generate the following "handy" formula:

where the critical temperature, *T*, is in Kelvins, the atomic mass, *m*, is in amu, the density, *ρ* is specific density (i.e. normalized to water), and the planet's radius, *r*, is measured in earth radii.
Although the physical meaning of this formula remains unexplained, it allows us to quantify the statement that atmospheres tend to be associated with large cold planets, and that it is easier for a planet to retain an atmosphere if the atmosphere consists of molecules with large atomic mass. (See **atmospheric escape**)

## Estimate of temperature as function of distance from the Sun edit

The question of whether a planet retains an atmosphere depends on the temperature of the planet, and the single most important factor that influences temperature is the distance from the Sun. Using arguments analogous to the critical temperature for escape from a planet's gravity, the Wikipedia article **Effective temperature**) discusses how a planet's distance from the Sun helps determine the planet's temperature. An important result of that discussion is the following calculation estimate of what a planet's temperature would be if distance from the Sun were the only factor that influences a planet's temperature:

- ,

where is the distance from the Sun, ≈5778K is the Sun's temperature, and ≈ 6.955×10^{8}is the Sun's radius. In science and engineering, nominal often represents an accepted approximation as opposed to an exact, typical, or average measurement. Here we use it to keep the discussion simple, as well as to obtain a calculation that will never require updating as new measurements are obtained.

This formula for a planets temperature, , makes the simplifying assumption that temperature is determined by an energy balance: The planet releases all the energy it gains from the Sun by warming to the point where the the energy released due to thermal radiation equals the energy absorbed due to proximity to the Sun. When the actual temperature is not close to the nominal temperature, we seek a reason why. In the case of Venus, the mechanism that causes a much higher actual temperature is the w:Greenhouse effect.

The first term (raised to the power) is essentially a fudge factor that includes complications beyond the scope of this article. These complications include cloud cover and how a planet transfers heat from the hot and cold regions. (See: *atmospheric escape* for more information on these terms.) The most important term is *a*, which is the
planet's albedo.
^{[4]} Taking *a*=1, we can obtain the following formula for the nominal temperature of a planet at a given distance from the Sun:

- ,

where *T* is in Kelvins and *D* is the distance to the moon or planet in AU.

## Defining the alpha factor edit

It is convenient to define alpha (α) as a dimensionless ratio that tells us whether the planet's proximity to the sun, its size, density, and atmospheric composition, all are conducive to retention of an atmosphere:

- .

When *α* is calculated for objects in the solar system, we expect the following:

- If
*α*is large, one would expect a dense atmosphere. - If
*α*is small, one would expect a tenuous atmosphere, or virtually no atmosphere.

The decision to take the square root of the temperature ratio was arbitrary, and made so that α would represent the ratio of the escape velocity to thermal speed.

## Table of parameters relevant to atmospheric retention edit

The following table includes the terrestrial planets and two moons most likely to contain atmospheres:

Object | Dist. (AU) |
radius (earth radii) |
density g/cm ^{3} |
T_{ave} (K) |
T_{nom} (K) |
gas | amu | T_{esc} (K) |
α | P_{surf} (atm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Earth | 1 | 1 | 5.515 | 288 | 279 | N2 | 28 | 422493 | 39 | 1 |

Venus | 0.72 | 0.95 | 5.24 | 737 | 328 | CO2 | 44 | 569308 | 42 | 91 |

Mars | 1.5 | 0.53 | 3.94 | 210 | 227 | CO2 | 44 | 134242 | 24 | 0.006 |

Saturn's Titan | 9.5 | 0.4 | 1.88 | 98 | 90 | N2 | 28 | 23507 | 16 | 1.45 |

Jupiter's Ganymede | 5.2 | 0.41 | 1.936 | ?* | 122 | O2 | 16 | 14456 | 11 | 0 |

Jupiter's Io | 5.2 | 0.29 | 3.528 | ?* | 122 | S02 | 64 | 50531 | 20 | 0 |

In this chart, **T _{ave}** is the actual (measured) average surface temperature,

**T**is a 'nominal' temperature based solely on the planet's distance from the sun, and

_{nom}**T**is a measure of how much gravity is present.

_{esc}**T**is the temperature the planet would need to have in order for the atmosphere to almost instantly disappear. Inspection of the following (hidden) table establishes that, except for the gas planets, the objects in the above list are most likely to retain an atmosphere against gravitational escape by thermal molecules.

_{esc}**P**is the pressure at the surface of the planet, in atmospheres.

_{surf}Object | Dist. (AU) |
radius (earth radii) |
density g/cm ^{3} |
T_{ave} (K) |
T_{nom} (K) |
gas | amu | T_{esc} (K) |
α | P_{surf} (atm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Jupiter | 5.2 | 11 | 1.33 | N/A | 122 | H2 | 2 | 875812 | 85 | N/A |

Saturn | 9.5 | 9.1 | 0.69 | N/A | 90 | H2 | 2 | 315419 | 59 | N/A |

Neptune | 30.1 | 3.9 | 1.64 | N/A | 51 | H2 | 2 | 133710 | 51 | N/A |

Uranus | 19.2 | 4 | 1.27 | N/A | 64 | H2 | 2 | 110082 | 41 | N/A |

Earth | 1 | 1 | 5.515 | 288 | 279 | N2 | 28 | 422493 | 39 | 1 |

Venus | 0.72 | 0.95 | 5.24 | 737 | 328 | CO2 | 44 | 569308 | 42 | 91 |

Mars | 1.5 | 0.53 | 3.94 | 210 | 227 | CO2 | 44 | 134242 | 24 | 0.006 |

Saturn's Titan | 9.5 | 0.4 | 1.88 | 98 | 90 | N2 | 28 | 23507 | 16 | 1.45 |

Jupiter's Ganymede | 5.2 | 0.41 | 1.936 | ?* | 122 | O2 | 16 | 14456 | 11 | 0 |

Jupiter's Io | 5.2 | 0.29 | 3.528 | ?* | 122 | S02 | 64 | 50531 | 20 | 0 |

Jupiter's Callisto | 5.2 | 0.38 | 1.83 | ?* | 122 | CO2 | 44 | 31478 | 16 | 0 |

Neptune's Triton | 30.1 | 0.21 | 2.061 | ?* | 51 | N2 | 28 | 7096 | 12 | 0 |

Mercury | 0.39 | 0.38 | 5.43 | ?* | 446 | O2 | 16 | 34869 | 9 | 0 |

Jupiter's Europa | 5.2 | 0.25 | 3.01 | ?* | 122 | O2 | 16 | 7909 | 8 | 0 |

Earth's Moon | 1 | 0.27 | 3.346 | ?* | 279 | Ar* | 40 | 27295 | 9 | 0 |

## discussion of the table edit

A few observations can be made:

**Earth and Venus** have nearly the same parameters. Moreover, Venus is hotter than one would calculate based on its proximity to the sun, and a hotter Venus would tend to favor more thermal escape from its gravitational field. The factor of 100 between the surface pressure of Venus and Earth needs to be explained.

**Saturn's Titan** has a dense atmosphere, while **Jupiter's Io** has a tenuous atmosphere, something that is not reflected by their *mβ* values. This needs to be explained.

Of all terrestrial planets with significant atmosphere (Venus, Earth, Mars), **Mars** has the lowest value of *mβ*. It should be no surprise that Mars also has the most tenuous atmosphere among these three planets. In a later section we shall discuss how this marginal ability of Mars to hold an atmosphere has modified the relative isotopic abundances of Argon in the Martian atmosphere.

## Argon isotope ratio on Mars edit

The table of beta values shown above suggests that Mars would have considerably more difficulty maintaining its atmosphere than Earth or Venus. This can be seen in the abundance ratio of the two isotopes of Argon (^{36}Ar and ^{38}Ar). The lighter isotope has a slightly higher chance of escaping from the planet, and as reflected by the figure, the result is a significant difference in the abundance ratio of these isotopes. This figure raises a two interesting points:

- The fact that this abundance exists and can be explained lends credibility to the assertion that we have samples of Martian rocks that have landed on Earth as meteorites from Mars.
- Isotopes of the same element have virtually the same chemistry, which renders isotope separation technically difficult. It is fortunate that only a few nations on Earth have the ability to separate (uranium-238 and uranium-235). So how does Mars manage to accomplish this separation with Argon?

#### Plausibility argument that isotope separation can occur on Mars edit

The difference in mass between the two isotopes of Argon is about 5.5%, which implies that at a given temperature, the average speed of the two isotopes differs less than 3%. Yet the difference in the isotope ratios on Mars, as compared with Earth is quite large. On Earth it is about 5.5, and on Mars it is closer to 3.5. The ratio is 5.5/3.5 ≈ 1.6, How does a difference in atomic mass less than 6% lead to a 60% change in isotope abundance?

To answer this question we must review the normal probability distribution. Many college students take a statistics course where the area under the tail of a normal distribution is used to determine probability. Physicists know this area as the erfc function. When z is sufficiently large, so that a sufficient small area is inside the tail, the following approximation is useful:

Inspection of this expression verifies that for large z, a small percent change in z will cause a large difference in the area under the tail. Compare for example the ratio of probabilities if z is increased slightly from z_{0} to z_{1}=z_{0}+ε.

For example, if z_{0} = 10.0 and z_{1} = 10.5 is 5% larger, the ratio of the tails is:

- .

To understand why only gas molecules at the extreme tail of the normal distribution, we use our "handy" formula to calculate the critical temperature for Mars. The specific density of Mars is 3.94 g/cm^{3}, the atomic mass of CO2 is 44, and Mars has a radius equal to .532 Earth radii. The critical temperature at which Mars immediately loses its atmosphere is

It is clear that molecules that escape the gravitational attraction of Mars are at the extreme tail of the distribution. And at this tail, even the smallest percent change in atomic mass will greatly affect the fraction of molecules that escape.

## Other mechanisms that influence atmospheric retention edit

The previous discussion is not intended to model atmospheric escape, but to illustrate the nature of the methods used. A large number of complications have been ignored. Correct modelling of such a complex process requires extensive use of computer modelling, as well as a bit of luck if a correct model is to emerge.

#### Hydrodynamic escape edit

While it has not been observed, it is theorized that an atmosphere with a high enough pressure and temperature can undergo a "hydrodynamic escape." In this situation atmosphere simply flows off into space, driven by thermal energy.^{[7]} Here it is possible to lose heavier molecules that would not normally be lost.

#### Significance of solar winds edit

The relative importance of each loss process is a function of planet mass, its atmosphere composition, and its distance from its sun. A common erroneous belief is that the primary non-thermal escape mechanism is atmospheric stripping by a solar wind in the absence of a magnetosphere. Excess kinetic energy from solar winds can impart sufficient energy to the atmospheric particles to allow them to reach escape velocity, causing atmospheric escape. The solar wind, composed of ions, is deflected by magnetic fields because the charged particles within the wind flow along magnetic field lines. The presence of a magnetic field thus deflects solar winds, preventing the loss of atmosphere.

Depending on planet size and atmospheric composition, however, a lack of magnetic field does not determine the fate of a planet's atmosphere. Venus, for instance, has no powerful magnetic field. Its close proximity to the Sun also increases the speed and number of particles, and would presumably cause the atmosphere to be stripped almost entirely, much like that of Mars. Despite this, the atmosphere of Venus is two orders of magnitudes denser than Earth's.

While Venus and Mars have no magnetosphere to protect the atmosphere from solar winds, photoionizing radiation (sunlight) and the interaction of the solar wind with the atmosphere of the planets causes ionization of the uppermost part of the atmosphere. This ionized region, in turn induces magnetic moments that deflect solar winds much like a magnetic field. This limits solar-wind effects to the uppermost altitudes of atmosphere, roughly 1.2–1.5 planetary radii away from the planet. Beyond this region, called a bow shock, the solar wind is slowed to subsonic velocities.^{[8]} Nearer to the surface, solar-wind dynamic pressure achieves a balance with the pressure from the ionosphere, in a region called the ionopause. This interaction typically prevents solar wind stripping from being the dominant loss process of the atmosphere.

#### Phenomena of non-thermal loss processes on moons with atmospheres edit

Several natural satellites in the Solar System have atmospheres and are subject to atmospheric loss processes. They typically have no magnetic fields of their own, but orbit planets with powerful magnetic fields.

#### Sequestration edit

This is a loss, not an escape; it is when molecules solidify out of the atmosphere onto the surface. This happens on Earth, when water vapor forms glacial ice or when carbon dioxide is sequestered in sediments. The dry ice caps on Mars are also an example of this process.

One mechanism for sequestration is chemical; for example, most of the carbon dioxide of the Earth's original atmosphere has been chemically sequestered into carbonate rock. Very likely a similar process has occurred on Mars. Oxygen can be sequestered by oxidation of rocks; for example, by increasing the oxidation states of ferric rocks from Fe^{2+} to Fe^{3+}. Gases can also be sequestered by adsorption, where fine particles in the regolith capture gas which adheres to the surface particles.

## Links, footnotes, and references edit

- [Primordial argon isotope fractionation in the atmosphere of Mars measured by the SAM instrument on Curiosity and implications for atmospheric loss. Geophysical Research Letters Vol. 40 Issue 21]
- [MSL/SAM Measurements of Nitrogen and Argon Isotopes in the Mars Atmosphere LPSC eposter-1712(2013)].
- [Atmospheric escape]
- [Effective temperature]

### References edit

- ↑ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atmospheric_escape&oldid=657024358
- ↑ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Effective_temperature&oldid=636341140
- ↑ http://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Work,_Power,_and_Energy&oldid=1388253
- ↑ http://www.asterism.org/tutorials/tut26-1.htm From NASA’s planetary sites, the brightest is Venus with an albedo of 0.65. That means 65% of incoming sunlight is reflected from the cloud-covered planet. The remaining 35% contributes to the heat energy of Venus. Mercury, at 0.11, has the lowest planetary albedo. Earth’s albedo is 0.37; Mars is 0.15; Jupiter, 0.52; Saturn, 0.47; Uranus, 0.51; Neptune 0.41. Pluto’s albedo varies from 0.5 to 0.7.
- ↑ Webster, Guy (April 8, 2013). "Remaining Martian Atmosphere Still Dynamic".
*NASA*. Retrieved April 9, 2013. - ↑ Wall, Mike (April 8, 2013). "Most of Mars' Atmosphere Is Lost in Space".
*Space.com*. Retrieved April 9, 2013. - ↑ David C. Catling and Kevin J. Zahnle, The Planetary Air Leak,
*Scientific American,*May 2009, p. 26 (accessed 25 July 2012) - ↑ Cite error: Invalid
`<ref>`

tag; no text was provided for refs named`Shizgal, 1996`