The purpose of this page is to contemplate changes to the Wikidebate

Summary positions edit

Place a succinctly stated position anywhere in the space below. You may later edit your own position as you wish. Also, if the issue gets resolved, please remove your position statement.'
  • It's not especially clear to me what the point of Wikidebates are if they are neither genuine conversation between individual users nor documentative in a journalistic or scholarly sense, being unsigned and unattributed. I don't see how they amount to more than collections of weasel words. I recommend that users be encouraged to sign their own arguments and to remove the requirement for users to add arguments to 'both sides'. AP295 (discusscontribs) 16:07, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If the current structure and rules are to remain as-is, perhaps a straightforward approach is to have the guidelines recommend that a wikidebate's discussion page be used for relevant discourse (rather than just "meta-discussion", as it were), and allow people to submit links to their essays at the bottom of the resource. AP295 (discusscontribs) 17:09, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Create a subpage to write an essay or elaborate on your position edit

Create a space for extended discussion by entering a title that is not already on the list below. Don't worry about giving your subpage the wrong name because we can later change that.
Subpage contributions

Contributions elsewhere on Wikiversity edit

Discussions on the Colloquium edit