Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070604063208

perhaps not too effectively, when a node has many subnodes... See category:threads 20070604

20070604063503

• Comment: See category:threads 20070604. This may be an idiosyncracy of this model...

--Hillgentleman|Talk 06:35, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

• reply[1]

Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070604063503 What links here

But it is still okay; just check the time stamp on each reply...

20070604063925

• Comment: For example, from category:threads 20070604 -->Wikiversity:Threaded_discussions_with_NavFrames_with_subst/20070522105803 --> look through the time stamps --> find the thread "We really can track new threads with category! " with time stamp 20070604063208.

Suggestions for improvements, folks? --Hillgentleman|Talk 06:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

• reply[2]

Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070604063925 What links here

And, of course, if the flow is sufficiently big, we may even use categorytree.

20070604064957

• Comment: To use the mw:extension:CategoryTree, we need to have the category created in the first place.

--Hillgentleman|Talk 06:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

• reply[3]

Not quite; Categorytree doesn't take a dynamical variable ...

20070604065253

• Comment: (

--Hillgentleman|Talk 06:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

• reply[4]

Now it does: CategoryTree can now be used as a parser function and can take arguments.

20071204114910

• Comment: See: mw:Extension:CategoryTree

--Hillgentleman|Talk 11:49, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

• reply[5]

What links here

What links here

What links here