Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519101448

A one liner may go here. edit

NavHead

This revision=20070519172843

~~Argument: Here we can elaborate....~~

--Hillgentleman|Talk 17:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reply[1]

Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519172843

Here is the point: the REVISIONTIMESTAMP is precisely for that purpose. edit

NavHead

This revision=20070519173345

Argument: BASEPAGENAME/1/1/1/1/1... can only produce a linear structure.

Originally I tried REVISIONID, which didn't work: if we substitute a revisionid, we get blank. --Hillgentleman|Talk 17:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reply[2]

Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519173345

And try not to create your own section. edit

NavHead

This revision=20070519173646

Argument: Use the "reply link" to create a new section, or else you would create a dead end.

--Hillgentleman|Talk 17:36, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reply[3]

I mean, edit

NavHead

This revision=20070519174254

Argument:

My "A one-liner may go here" is a reply to ":I'm guessing that my comment goes here." and "Here is the point: the REVISIONTIMESTAMP is precisely for that purpose." replies "Can there be sections within treads". But that latter section was created articficailly (without pressing the "reply button") and so it hijacked the reply link to the previous comment. Or we can say, two different comments (and two different replies) were merged. That makes the questions and answers crossed. So it is a little confusing.

In short, Don't create your own section. Use the "reply" link. Once you have created a section, you are free to edit your previous comments, correct mistakes, etc.

--Hillgentleman|Talk 17:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]