Web Science/Part1: Foundations of the web/Web content/Metadata/script

Metadata placed in the head of your HTML page meta tags often have both the name and content attributes

<meta name="description" 
 content="Authors' web site for Building Java Programs." />

<meta name="keywords" content="java, textbook" />

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
 content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />

<head>
<meta name="author"
 content="web page's author" />
<meta name="revised"
 content="web page version and/or last modification date" />
<meta name="generator"
 content="the software used to create the page" />
</head>

Metadata was foreseen very early as part of HTML, but:

it does not really work
usual problem: ignored
worse problem: intentionally forged, e.g. wrong keywords given in order to mislead search engine
result: search engines have ignored metadata for two decades

Situation changed with:

SearchMonkey
RichSnippets
Schema.org

Difference:

People behave
- to maximize their benefit
- targeted benefits:
1. Being found and highly ranked by search engines
2. Displaying what you want to be displayed
  - Resulting rationale:
    1. Incentive mechanisms must make sure that the targeted benefits are achieved
    2. Idea for search monkey:
      - don't use metadata to improve finding and ranking by search engines (since it is not readable it incentivizes people to mislead search engines)
      - use metadata to improve the display - namely the display of search engine result summarization
      - Implications:
        authors care about appropriate presentation
        
        incentives for authors/publishers, search engine providers and users who search coincide

Semantic annotations:

microdata
microformats
RDFa

15% of web sites/pages use some form of semantic annotation

Show examples how to do semantic annotation using RDFa (note to Rene. I'd target the philosophy to show students newest developments, such as HTML5; in the same vein: don't show micro format, micro data, but RDFa)