We do induction over , the number of the vectors in the family. For
,
there is nothing to show. Suppose now that the statement is already proven for , and let linearly independent vectors
-
be given. By the induction hypothesis, applied to the vectors
(which are also linearly independent)
-
there exists a subset
such that the family
-
is a basis of . We want to apply
the basis exchange lemma
to this basis. As it is a basis, we can write
-
Suppose that all coefficients
.
Then we get a contradiction to the linear independence of
, .
Hence, there exists some
with
.
We put
.
Then
is a subset of with elements. By the basis exchange lemma, we can replace the basis vector
by ,
and we obtain the new basis
-
The final statement follows, since we have a subset with
elements inside a set with
elements.