United States Law/Trusts and Estates
Policy and Introduction
editThe field of trusts and estates is vitally important to all lawyers.
“ | In this world, nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes. | ” |
— Benjamin Franklin, in a letter to Jean-Baptiste Le Roy |
Whether in their own lives or as an advocate, every lawyer will come into contact with the estate system. For students who go into this field, attorneys will plan, draft, and advise clients on the administration of wills and trusts. Practitioners who specialize in this field can expect to develop significant substantive experience in the complexities of estate planning, including the intricacies of state and federal wealth transfer taxation (i.e., gift, estate, and generation-skipping transfer (GST) taxation). Many estate planning practitioners go on to additional study in Master of Laws programs (LL.M.s) in taxation.
In the United States, the intent of an estate planning attorney is to ensure their client's intent is carried out after the client is incapacitated or dead.
The economical, psychological, sociological, and political implications for wealth transfer in this country are immensely important topics, but beyond the scope of this course. Additionally, although a brief introduction into the federal taxation of wealth transfers is discussed, the specifics and intricacies of the federal Internal Revenue Code are not evaluated in detail and are better to left to a course in federal estate and gift taxation.
The inequality of income and wealth within the United States has been steadily growing. Correspondingly, the subject of inequality has been an increasing focus for research in recent years. The sources, status, and projections of wealth inequality in the country have been fiercely debated.
Testamentary Freedom and "Dead Hand" Control
editPolicy Limitations on Testamentary Freedom
editEstate of Shapira v. Union National Bank (Ohio Ct. C.P. 1974)
editOhio Court of Common Pleas, Mahoning County, Probate Division
N.E.2d 825, 39 Ohio Misc. 28, 66 Ohio Op. 2d (O.O.2d) 268
January 22, 1947
Intestacy
editIntroduction
editThe Uniform Probate Code (UPC) Approach
editThe Restatement (3rd) Approach
editSpecific State Approaches
editWills and Testacy
editTestamentary Capacity and Contests
editWill Formalities
editConstruction and Interpretation
editProbate Administration
editNonprobate Transfers
editNonprobate Assets
editNonprobate Contractual Devices
editSpousal and Familial Protections
editSpousal Protections
editDower and Curtsey
editCommunity Property Protections
editOmitted Spouse Protections
editThe Elective Share
editThe Augmented Estate
editDescendant Protections
editOmitted Child Protections
editThe Legitime System and Other Protections
editTrusts
editCreation of Trusts
editConstruction and Interpretation
editTrust Administration
editAlienation, Modification, and Termination
editCharitable Purposes and the Cy Pres Doctrine
editSpecific Property Interests
editFuture Interests
editFuture Interests in Property
editThe Rule Against Perpetuities
editPowers of Appointment
editFundamentals of the Taxation of Wealth Transfers
editReferences
edit- ↑ Ascher, Mark L.; Clark, Elias; McCouch, Grayson M.P.; Murphy, Arthur W. (2013), Cases and Materials on Gratuitous Transfers (6th ed.), West Publishing Co., p. 1