# arXiv:1412.8082v1 [math.NT] 27 Dec 2014 2018. 10. 15.¢ arXiv:1412.8082v1 [math.NT] 27 Dec...

date post

22-Jan-2021Category

## Documents

view

0download

0

Embed Size (px)

### Transcript of arXiv:1412.8082v1 [math.NT] 27 Dec 2014 2018. 10. 15.¢ arXiv:1412.8082v1 [math.NT] 27 Dec...

ar X

iv :1

41 2.

80 82

v1 [

m at

h. N

T ]

2 7

D ec

2 01

4

A RATIONALITY RESULT FOR

THE EXTERIOR AND THE SYMMETRIC SQUARE L-FUNCTION.

HARALD GROBNER

With an appendix by Nadir Matringe

Abstract. Let G = GL2n over a totally real number field F and n ≥ 2. Let Π be a cuspidal automorphic representation of G(A), which is cohomological and a functorial lift from SO(2n + 1). The latter condition can be equivalently reformulated that the exterior square L-function of Π has a pole at s = 1. In this paper, we prove a rationality result for the residue of the exterior square L-function at s = 1 and also for the holomorphic value of the symmetric square L-function at s = 1 attached to Π. On the way, we also show a rationality result for the residue of the Rankin–Selberg L-function at s = 1, which is very much in the spirit of our recent joint paper with Harris and Lapid [11], as well as of one of the main results in a recent article of Balasubramanyam–Raghuram [2]

Contents

1. Introduction 1 2. Notation and conventions 5 3. Facts and conventions for cuspidal automorphic representations 8 4. Top-degree periods 10 5. An Aut(C)-rational assignment for Whittaker functions 12 6. An integral representation of the residue of the exterior square L-function 14 7. A rationality result for the exterior square L-function 17 8. A rationality result for the Rankin–Selberg L-function 21 9. A rationality result for the symmetric square L-function 27 Appendix 28 References 31

1. Introduction

1.1. General background. Let F be an algebraic number field and let Π be a cuspidal automorphic representation of GL2(AF ). Rationality results for special values of the associate automorphic L-function L(s,Π) have been studied by several authors over the last decades. For the scope of this paper, we would like to mention Y. Manin and G. Shimura, who were

Date: October 15, 2018. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary: 11F67; Secondary: 11F41, 11F70, 11F75, 22E55. Key words and phrases. cuspidal automorphic representation, exterior square, L-function, rationality

result, period, regulator, H.G. is supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), project number P 25974-N25.

1

http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.8082v1

2 HARALD GROBNER

the first to study special values of L(s,Π) in the particular case, when F is totally real, i.e., when Π comes from a Hilbert modular form, cf. [26] and [32], and P. F. Kurchanov, who treated the case of a CM-field F in a series of (meanwhile seemingly forgotten) papers, cf. [23, 24]. Shortly later, G. Harder published some articles, see [14, 15], in which he described a general approach to such rationality results. In [14], Harder considered the case of an arbitrary number field F , while in [15], he extended the methods of the above authors to some automorphic representations, which do not necessarily come from cusp forms (for F imaginary quadratic). The case of GL2 over a general number field F has also been considered later on by Shimura, see [33].

It took some time until extensions of these results to general linear groups GLn of higher rank n were available. Important achievements include Ash-Ginzburg, [1], Kazhdan-Mazur- Schmidt, [21] and Mahnkopf, [25].

Guided by the above methods, meanwhile, there is a growing number of results that have been proved about the rationality of special values of certain automorphic L-functions attached to GLn. As a selection of examples, relevant to the present paper, we refer to Raghuram [28, 27], Harder-Raghuram [16], Grobner-Harris [10]; Grobner-Raghuram [13], Grobner-Harris-Lapid [11] and Balasubramanyam-Raghuram [2].

In all of these reference, the corresponding rationality result is obtained by writing the special L-value at hand as an algebraic multiple of a certain period invariant1. This period is defined by comparison of a rational structure on a cohomology space, attached to the given automorphic representation Π, with a rational structure on a model-space of (the finite part of) Π, such as a Whittaker model or a Shalika model. (The word “rational structure” here refers to a subspace of the vector space, carrying the action of Π, which is essentially defined over the field of rationality of Π and at the same time stable under the group action.) While the first rational structure on the cohomology space is purely of geometric nature and has its origin in the cohomology of arithmetic groups (or better: the cohomology of arithmetically defined locally symmetric spaces), the latter rational structure is defined by reference to the uniqueness to the given model-space.

In this paper, we continue the above considerations. But while most of the aforementioned papers deal with special values of the Rankin–Selberg L-function (by some variation or the other), the principal L-function, or the Asai L-functions, here we would like to study the algebraicity of the exterior square L-function and the symmetric square L-function, attached to a cuspidal automorphic representation of the general linear group.

1.2. The main results of this paper. To put ourselves in medias res, let F be a totally real number field and let G = GLN/F , N = 2n with n ≥ 2. The restrictions on F and the index of the general linear groups under consideration are owed to the inevitable, as it will become clear below. Indeed, let Π be a cuspidal automorphic representation of G(A) and let Wψ(Π) be its ψ-Whittaker model. As we want to exploit the results of Bump–Friedberg, [6], we shall assume that the partial exterior square L-function LS(s,Π,Λ2) of Π has a pole at s = 1. (Here, S is a finite set of places of F , containing all archimedean ones, such that for a place v /∈ S, the local components Πv and ψv are unramified.) In particular, this forces

1The approach taken in [11], however, is a certain, basis-free variation of the latter.

3

N = 2n to be even, see [19], Thm. 2, and furthermore Π to be self-dual, Π ∼= Π∨, and to have trivial central character.

Our first main result gives a rationality statement for the residue Ress=1(L S(s,Π,Λ2)) of

the exterior square L-function. More precisely, we obtain the following result:

Theorem 1.1. Let F be a totally real number field and G = GL2n/F , n ≥ 2. Let Π be a unitary cuspidal automorphic representation of G(A), which is cohomological with respect to an irreducible, self-contragredient, algebraic, finite-dimensional representation Eµ of G∞. Assume that Π satisfies the equivalent conditions of Prop. 3.5, i.e., the partial exterior square L-function LS(s,Π,Λ2) has a pole at s = 1. Then, for every σ ∈ Aut(C), there is a non- trivial period pt(σΠ), defined by a comparison of a given rational structure on the Whittaker model of σΠf and a rational structure on a realization of

σΠf in cohomology in top degree t, and a non-trivial archimedean period pt(σΠ∞), such that

σ

(

L(1 2 ,Πf) · Ress=1(L

S(s,Π,Λ2))

pt(Π) pt(Π∞)

)

= L(1

2 , σΠf ) · Ress=1(L

S(s, σΠ,Λ2))

pt(σΠ) pt(σΠ∞) .

In particular, L(1

2 ,Πf) ·Ress=1(L

S(s,Π,Λ2)) ∼Q(Πf ) p t(Π) pt(Π∞),

where “∼Q(Πf )” means up to multiplication of the right hand side by an element in the number field Q(Πf ).

This is proved in details in §7.3, see Thm. 7.3. For a precise definition of the periods pt(σΠ) and pt(σΠ∞) we refer to Prop. 4.2, respectively (7.2), the non-vanishing of the archimedean period pt(σΠ∞) being shown – building on a result of B. Sun – in our Thm. 7.1. The number field Q(Πf ) in the theorem is (by Strong Multiplicity One) the aforementioned field of rationality of the cuspidal automorphic representation Π. See §2.5 and §3.3.

The key result, which we use, in order to derive the above theorem, is a certain integral- representation, obtained by Bump-Friedberg, [6], of the residue Ress=1(L

S(s,Π,Λ2)) of the exterior square L-function in terms of integrating over a cycle Z(A)H(F )\H(A). Here, Z is the centre of G and H = GLn ×GLn, suitably embedded into G, cf. 2.2.

More precisely, if one combines the three main results of [6], then, under the assumptions made in the theorem, one obtains the following equality, shown in our Thm. 6.1: (1.2)

cn · Φ̂(0)

∫

Z(A)H(F )\H(A)

ϕ(J(g, g′)) dg dg′ = LS(1

2 ,Π) ·Ress=1(L

S(s,Π,Λ2))

LS(n, 1)2 · ∏

v∈S

Zv(ξv, fv,1)

L(n, 1v) .

Here, Φ is a certain global Schwartz-Bruhat function on An, chosen with care in §6.1, and cn · Φ̂(0) is the (non-zero) residue at s = 1 of an Eisenstein series attached to a section fs = ⊗vfv,s, which is defined by Φ. See §6.1 and §6.4 for the precise definitions of the terms appearing in (1.2). What one should observe is that the value of the partial L-function LS(n, 1) of the trivial character of A at n appears in the formula. In order for the pole of LS(s,Π,Λ2) at s = 1 not to cancel with the pole of LS(n, 1) at n = 1, we assumed n ≥ 2, which explains the corresponding assumption in Thm. 1.1 (resp. Thm. 7.3). (As for the case of n = 1, LS(s,Π,Λ2) = LS(s, 1), the analogue of Thm. 1.1 would boil down to a rationality result for the central critical value of the L-function of unitary cusp forms of GL2(A), which is known, e.g., by Harder [14]. Therefore, considering only n ≥ 2 is not a serious restriction.)

4 HARALD GROBNER

Observe that the top degree t, mentioned in Thm. 1.1, where Π has non-trivial

Recommended

*View more*