Talk:WikiJournal of Science/Widgiemoolthalite
WikiJournal of Science
Open access • Publication charge free • Public peer review • Wikipedia-integrated
Previous
Volume 1(1)
Volume 1(2)
Volume 2(1)
Volume 3(1)
Volume 4(1)
Volume 5(1)
Volume 6(1)
This article has been through public peer review.
It was adapted from the Wikipedia page Widgiemoolthalite and contains some or all of that page's content licensed under a CC BY-SA license. Post-publication review comments or direct edits can be left at the version as it appears on Wikipedia.
First submitted:
Accepted:
Article text
PDF: Download
DOI: 10.15347/wjs/2019.007
QID: Q81440318
XML: Download
Share article
Email
| 
Facebook
| 
Twitter
| 
LinkedIn
| 
Mendeley
| 
ResearchGate
Suggested citation format:
Collin Knopp-Schwyn (25 August 2019). "Widgiemoolthalite". WikiJournal of Science 2 (1): 7. doi:10.15347/WJS/2019.007. Wikidata Q81440318. ISSN 2470-6345. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiversity/en/6/63/Widgiemoolthalite.pdf.
Citation metrics
AltMetrics
Page views on Wikipedia
Wikipedia: This work is adapted from the Wikipedia article Widgiemoolthalite (CC BY-SA). Content has also subsequently been used to update that same Wikipedia article Widgiemoolthalite.
License: 
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original author and source are credited.
Henry Hoff 
(handling editor) contact
Robert M. Hazen
Braam Smit
Article information
Plagiarism check
Pass. Report from WMF copyvios tool: only trivial duplication descriptors were found (e.g. "silky luster and a pale bluish-green streak"). T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 02:14, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
First peer review
Review by Robert Hazen , Carnegie Institution's Geophysical Laboratory and George Mason University
These assessment comments were submitted on , and refer to this previous version of the article
I have reviewed the proposed Wiki article on Widgiemoolthalite and found it general accurate and well written. I would change two words. "disorganized structure" in the abstract and "structural disarray" in the section on Structure should be changed to the more conventional "disordered structure" and "structural disorder", respectively.
Thanks for the chance to see this contribution.
Good day, Dr. Hazen. Thank you for your comments on this article and for taking the time to make them. I've reworded both instances as you suggested so they now read "an unknown though likely disordered crystal structure" and "a high degree of structural disorder was suspected" respectively. Thanks again and please let me know if you have any other commentary on this article. Best —Collin (Bobamnertiopsis)t c 16:19, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Editorial comments
Comments by Marshallsumter ,
- "The X-ray powder diffraction pattern can be indexed on a monoclinic unit cell similar to that of hydromagnesite, with a : 10.06(17), b : 8.75(5), c : 8.32(4)A, and β : 114.3(8)." Nickel, Robinson, and Mumme, include the error on the lattice parameters. Is there some reason for not including them here?
- Have you attempted to create either a ball and stick or polyhedral crystal structure model with a program such as XtalDraw? You can start from the atomic positions for hydromagnesite to get lattice parameters within the above Widgiemoolthalite range? --Marshallsumter (discuss • contribs) 15:09, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
In re your first point: Only that I was drawing from Gamsjäger et al. (2005) for those measurements, and they did not report the error values. Thank you for catching this! I'll take a look at your second point in a few days. I'm not very familiar with XtalDraw but I'll see what I can conjure up. Thank you for taking the time to look over this page. —Collin (Bobamnertiopsis)t c 20:24, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Comments by anonymous editor ,
I also took a stab at the ball-and-stick model. Best —Collin (Bobamnertiopsis)t c 20:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Very nice model! For the readers you may want to include a legend of color to element. --Marshallsumter (discuss • contribs) 01:32, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks! I've added a key, definitely the right call. —Collin (Bobamnertiopsis)t c 15:07, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Second peer review
Review by Braam Smit , Senior Mineralogist at CMOC-Northparkes Mines
These assessment comments were submitted on , and refer to this previous version of the article
Well written article and valuable contribution. If available, adding the chemical equation describing the formation of Widgiemoolthalite alteration from Ni Sulphide will be a very useful addition to the article.
Thank you for the review! I agree that the weathering equation would be a fantastic addition to this article if it were available but to the best of my scouring the known sources, it is not. Please let me know if you have any other questions, comments, or concerns. All the best, —Collin (Bobamnertiopsis)t c 20:34, 22 July 2019 (UTC)