Talk:WikiJournal of Science/Submissions/Timeline of quantum mechanics (abridged)

First review

Editorial comments:

1. There are about two versions of "Quantum mechanics timeline" that may be better as one. The second being "Quantum mechanics timeline". The others are abridged.
2. "Timeline of quantum mechanics (abridged)" and "Abridged timeline of quantum mechanics" are supposed to be the same historical version on Wikipedia but I restored the first before I found the second which was not on the "Articles awaiting reviewer" list.
3. "Abridged timeline of quantum mechanics", specifically Wikipedia:Timeline of quantum mechanics has images with each section which are excellent and timely. "Timeline of quantum mechanics (abridged)" does not.
4. "How things work college course/Quantum mechanics timeline" has excellent and timely images but only for the 20th century.
5. "How things work college course/Quantum mechanics timeline" has the note at the top: "This timeline serves to guide student in understanding this Quiz, which has been placed on the openStax College list of quizzes." This purpose appears to be at odds with abridged timelines.
6. "Abridged timeline of quantum mechanics" has an in-text red link and several among its references.
7. Many references in "How things work college course/Quantum mechanics timeline" are not well-formatted and are probably not journal quality.
8. "Timeline of quantum mechanics (abridged)" has several red-linked references. --Marshallsumter (discuss • contribs) 20:35, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
9. "Abridged timeline of quantum mechanics" has the more complete text and is the one to be reviewed. I will copy this review to its Discuss and continue the review there. --Marshallsumter (discuss • contribs) 23:34, 2 May 2017 (UTC)