Talk:Evidence-based assessment/Assessment Center/Clinician resources

2006 Summer 2023 Goals

• Create and test assembly line for putting assessments into REDCap
• Create a list of best free measures (starter kits) for adults * and youth on several important diagnostic domains: ADHD/ODD/CD, * Anxiety, Bipolar, Depression, Trauma/PTSD, Substance Use, SITB, Development/QoL.
• Decide on the infrastructure (and implement) for the REDCap project that best facilitates clinician and client use: instrument selection, client tracking, feedback.
• Create a process for evaluating, selecting, and creating translations of assessments in REDCap.

Contacts

Qualtrics Version Admins

Eyoungstrom / eyoungstrom@hgaps.org Lizzie Emma Caroline V?

REDCap Version Admins

Elborde / g.perezalgorta

OSF.io Admins

Eyoungstrom / Eyoungstrom@hgaps.org

Changes to Tables

• Formatting consistency -- no periods at end, be consistent about bullets (or no bullets), capitalization, defining acronyms and using consistent names
• Audit:
  • Make sure that PDF link it to archive in OSF
  • Add links
    • To AC (Qualtrics, REDCap)
    • To OSF
    • Any other resources (don't delete, but clarify, not "Link here" <-- link to WHAT? :-)
    • Wikiversity page about measure
    • Wikipedia article about measure
• Templates:
  • Like (), make templates to indicate if link goes to OSF, HGAPS "Granary"/repository, Wikipedia, Wikiversity, Assessment Center....
  • Have Cody, Brei make missing ones, and
    • Record how
    • have other team deploy

Demographics

Here's a link to a 2022 Pew survey about USA attitudes towards general. Helpful getting a description of the nuanced opinions. Pew has been studying the topic for a while, so there is information about national trends here, too.

For things in the Assessment Center, it would make sense to

1. Standardize
2. Go with a "middle way" approach (the Pew report suggests a methodology, and tying to it would be a strong precedent)
3. Make a demographics module to use consistently across projects
4. Have a web page describing the rationale (again, Pew seems like a good middle ground starting point)
5. Explain to participants how the information would be used, both vis them and to help other people. It's one thing if it changes scoring for the individual; it's more abstract and altruistic if it's to provide benchmarks for other people, and a third thing if its for research; the worst is the scenario where they get asked a lot of questions and nothing happens with it.

To dos:

• add information to both of the assessment tables
• clean up the resources by domain
• add more clinician eba resources

[] Clarify when the link is to one of the Qualtrics scoring options

[] (and we should systematically add them all)

List of Measures to Add and Why

Petersen Pubertal Screening Device: Free, widely used in research, and we have been ignoring it as a construct in clinical psychological practice

GBI-10m, GBI-10Da, GBI-10Db, GBI sleep -- all have recently been validated in 2020 & 2021 papers, and are much more convenient than the full length version (Mood and sleep)

Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) -- requested as a process measure for treatment

'ICOHM Standard set of outcome measures'

RCADS-25 (anxiety and depression)

OCI-CV

CRIES-8/13

C-SSRS self report screener (self harm)

KIDSCREEN-10 (Quality of Life)

CGAS <-- super easy; most valuable if there were a way of tracking over time

CALIS

---

Anything that looks solid that is COVID-19 related was trendy and worth adding

---

Also need to look at the Becker-Haimes update of the Beidas et al. 2015 "Best of the Free" -- that will be a major source of new measures

Eyoungstrom (discuss • contribs) 00:16, 23 May 2020 (UTC)