Talk:Ethical Management of the English Language Wikiversity
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Salmon of Doubt in topic question
question
editI would like to know how the text in the Notes section relates to the subject of this project. At first glance it appeared to be vandalism... --mikeu talk 13:57, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- I just noticed the redirect. Never mind. --mikeu talk 14:00, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- {ec} They were notes to myself - translated:
- Daniel Brandt Vandal Impostor
- Good faith was assumed of a penis vandal, but not of a vested contributor. Why does the project lack strong controls to prevent vandals from creating damage?
- Wikiversity mainly used by parties as a revenge tool
- Meta pages used as ways to "get" opponents.
- Thought experiment - could I create a project on "how to get away with murder/rape" and compare it to the conduct of contributors to the encyclopedia - why or why not?
- Daniel Brandt Vandal Impostor
However, I support the project created by CM, and have redirected this there, relinquishing the space if someone feels like developing this project. Salmon of Doubt 14:02, 11 September 2008 (UTC)