Let
denote a bound from above, so that
holds for all
. We assume that
is not a Cauchy sequence. Then there exists some
such that for every
, there exist indices
fulfilling
.
Because of the monotonicity, there is also for every
an
with
.
Hence, we can define inductively an increasing sequence of natural numbers satisfying
-
-
and so on. On the other hand, there exists, due to the
axiom of Archimedes,
some
with
-

The sum of the first
differences of the
subsequence
,
,
is

This implies
,
contradicting the condition that
is an upper bound for the sequence.