Overview edit
enter text here about measure and uses
History edit
enter text here about general background and history on measure
Main Features edit
Uses edit
- Screening
- Diagnosis
- Service Access
- Monitoring Treatment
- Progress
- Outcome
- Minimally Important Difference or Clinical Significance
- Research
- RDoC connection
Highlights of evolution edit
- Any major version changes
Competitive Comparison edit
- What are other widely used alternatives?
- How does this compare to others?
Scale (Link) | Ease of Use | Languages | Psychometrics | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Text here | Text here | Text here | Text here | Text here |
Text here | Text here | Text here | Text here | Text here |
Text here | Text here | Text here | Text here | Text here |
Text here | Text here | Text here | Text here | Text here |
Development edit
- How were items and content written?
- How was the content checked?
- How were the scales developed?
- Rationally? By experts?
- Statistically?
Administration and scoring edit
General Administration Procedure edit
- Individual or group? Paper, computer, phone?
- Typical time to administer (<--could look at metadata of completion times)
- Age range
- Any special notes for other respondents?
- How to explain purpose to different respondents? (any pro tips for getting valid data?)
- Readability
Computer Administration and Scoring edit
- Notes about any platforms (especially open ones), hardware and software requirements
- REDCap?
- QSF file?
- Links to syntax or other materials
- Pros and cons of computerization
Scoring Instructions edit
- What are the scales? What items go on which scale? Is the total meaningful?
- Could include tables or figures
- What to do with missing responses?
- Are there profiles?
- Percentiles or standard scores?
- Cut scores or Diagnostic Likelihood Ratios?
Interpretation edit
- Scores
- What items go on what scales?
- Raw scores
- Percent of max possible (POMP) scores?
- Percentiles or standard scores?
- Any IRT calibration or special weighting
- If norms
- Sex norms?
- Age norms?
- Informant norms?
- Other demographic considerations
- Evidence of differences across SES, social group, country?
- Integrating information from multiple sources
- Step-by-step sequence for interpretation
Versions edit
Lengths edit
Full length, short forms, alternate forms
Respondents edit
Self (Youth, Adult), Caregiver/Parent, Teacher, Peer/Other, Observer, other
Normative Data edit
Description of the normative sample (if any) or the larger samples that have been published.
Ethnic differences?
Translations edit
Are versions available in additional languages?
Reliability edit
Version | 10-item | 20-item | Full-length |
Mean | 3.08 | 3.05 | 3.04 |
SD | .47 | .47 | .43 |
Range | 2.00 to 4.30 | 2.05 to 4.25 | 2.10 to 3.97 |
Omega Total | .78 | .87 | .89 |
Omega Hierarchical (higher order factor, Schmid-Leiman) | .65 | .73 | .74 |
Omega Group Factors (variance in total score due to 5 factors) | .38 | .22 | .23 |
Observed Mean inter-item correlation | .11 | .15 | .12 |
Observed λ6 | .78 | .86? | .89 |
Projected correlation with full | .72 | .81 | -- |
Observed correlation | .92 | .98 | -- |
Reliability >.8 across range (IRT) | -1.5 to 4.1 | -3.3 to 5.0 | -3.6 to 5.8 |
Discrepancy (Long – Short) | .04ns | .01ns | -- |
SD discrepancy | .xx | .yy | |
95% limits of agreement | .yy to .zz | .yy to .zz | |
Savings in Length (%) | 67% | 33% | 0% |
Standard Error of Measurement | .22 | .17 | .14 |
Standard Error of Difference | .31 | .24 | .20 |
90% Critical Change | .51 | .39 | .33 |
95% Critical Change | .61 | .47 | .40 |
Minimal Important Difference (MID, d ~.5) | .24 | .24 | .22 |
Note. Observed correlations are based on embedded item administration. Standard errors used OmegaTotal as reliability; ns = no significant difference between short and long form.
Validity edit
- Factorial validity
- Convergent and divergent/discriminant validity
- What things should correlate highly? Do they? (= convergent)
- What about measures of other constructs? Do they show lower correlations? (= discriminant)
- Discriminative validity - does it separate groups correctly? (= classification accuracy)
- Other criterion validity
Peer Reviewed Research edit
Special Populations edit
References edit
Links edit
- To PDFs (in OSF?)
- To original site?
- To translations
- To Assessment Center
- To Code
Appendices edit
Code edit
Click here for R code
|
---|
R code goes here |
Click here for SPSS code
|
---|
SPSS code goes here |
Click here for SAS code
|
---|
SAS code goes here |
Codebooks edit
- Marked up PDF
- Google sheet