New Zealand Law/Tort
{{Template:law}} {{Template:study guide}} {{Template:non-formal education}} {{Template:0%done}} |
Accident Compensation edit
Statutes edit
Injury Prevention Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2001 edit
Accident Compensation Act 1972 edit
Accident Compensation Act 1982 edit
Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Act 1992 edit
Accident Insurance Act 1998 edit
Accident Insurance Amendment Act 2000 edit
Cases edit
G v Auckland Hospital Board [1976] 1 NZLR 638 edit
Walbutton v ACC edit
- Held
- An accident is an event that is not intended by the person who suffers the misfortune.
Donselaar v Donselaar edit
Willis v AG edit
ACC v Mitchell edit
- Held
- There is no need to show that an accident is caused by some external force. (Reversed by s3(a) 1992 Act)
ACC v F edit
- Facts
- Husband sued for depression brought on by wife's injury.
- Held
- While the husband's depression was an unlooked for mishap, the husband’s injury was not the relevant accident and mental injury must accompany physical injury.
ACC v E edit
Facts: E was required by her workplace to undergo a management course by her employer and subsequently suffered suffered mental breakdown.
Held: E was initially turned down for cover under the ACC scheme because it was thought that the scheme only covered mental injury which was accompanied by a physical injury. Court of Appeal overturned the decision, deciding "physical and mental" was to be interpreted generously, to be applied as "physical or mental." This indicates the courts desire to interpret ACC legislation with wide breadth.
QLDC v Palmer edit
McGrory v Ansett NZ edit
Harrild v Director of Proceedings edit
Sivasubramanium v Yarrall edit
Jordan v ACC edit
ACC v Booth edit
ACC v Auckland Health Board edit
MacDonald v ACC (1985) 5 NZAR 276 edit
Green v Matheson edit
Polansky v ACC edit
Childs v Hillock edit
Brownlie v Good Health Wanganui (2005) CA edit
- Held
- Non-treatment is as much medical misadventure as negligent treatment
meow
A v Bottril [2003] 2 NZLR 721 (PC) edit
- see A v Bottril
McDermott v Wallace edit
Articles edit
- Margaret McGregor Vennell "Accident Compensation" [1992] NZ Recent LR 1
- Manning [1992] NZ Recent LR 10
- Geoff McLay "Nervous Shock, Tort and Accident Compensation: Tort regained?" (1999) 30 VUWLR 197
- Manning "Daniels v Thompson: Double Punishment or Double Trouble?" [1998] New Zealand L Rev 721
- Richard Gaskins "Recalling the Future of ACC" [2000] VUWLR 17
- Stephen Todd "Exemplary Damages" (1998) 18 NZULR 145
- Ailsa Duffy "Common Law Response to the Accident Compensation Scheme" [2003] VUWLR 21
Negligence edit
Cases edit
Duty of Care edit
- Anns v Merton LBC
- South Pacific v NZ Security
- Spring v Guardian Assocs
- Midland Metals v ChCh Press
- Rolls Royce v CHH
Auditors - Negligent Misstatement edit
- Scott Group v McFarlane
- Caparo v Dickman
- Boyd Knight v Purdue
Auditors - Other edit
- Price Waterhouse v Kwan
- Deloitte Haskins & Sells v National Mutual Life
- Wellington District Law Soc v PW
Council liability edit
- Anns v Merton LBC
- Bowen v Paramount Builders
- Brown v Heathcote CC
- Murphy v Brentwood DC
- Invercargill CC v Hamlin
- Three Meade St v Rotorua DC
Cases v Govt #1 edit
- X v Bedforshire CC (1995)
- AG v Prince (1998)
- Barrett v Enfield LBC (1999)
- W v Essex CC (2000)
- B v Attorney-General (2004) 3 NZLR 145 (PC)
Cases v Govt #2 edit
- A-G v Carter (2003)
- A-G v Body Corporate (2005)
- Tai Hobson v A-G (2006)
Nervous Shock edit
- Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire
- Van Soest v Residentical Health Mgt Unit
- W v Essex CC
Tort v Contractual Remedies edit
- Henderson v Merrett Syndicates
- Turton v Kuslake
- Rolls Royce NZ v CH
Limitation Period edit
- Invercargill CC v Hamlin
Nuisance edit
Private Nuisance edit
A-G v Geothermal Produce [1987] 2 NZLR 348 edit
BNZ v Greenwood [1984] 1 NZLR 525 edit
French v Auckland City Council [1974] 1 NZLR 340 edit
Hunter v Canary Wharf [1997] AC 655 edit
Public Nuisance edit
Rylands v Fletcher Nuisance edit
Rylands v Fletcher [1866] LR 1 Ex 265 edit
Rickards v Lothian [1913] AC 263 edit
- Facts
- An unknown person intentionally blocked a drain on the defendant's property causing water to overflow and damage the plaintiff's stock.
- Held:
1. An exception to Rylands & Fletcher liability - a person is not responsible for the acts of third parties.
- 2. Water supply and conveniences are not non-natural uses.
Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 WLR 53 edit
Hamilton v Papakura District Council [2000] 1 NZLR 265 edit
Transco PLC v Stockport MBC [2004] 2 AC 1 edit
Defamation edit
Statutes edit
Cases edit
- Charleston v News Group Newspapers Ltd [1995] 2 AC 65
- Mount Cook Group Ltd v Johnstone Motors [1990] 2 NZLR 488
- Templeton v Jones [1984] 1 NZLR 448
- Prebble v TVNZ [1994] 3 NZLR 1
- Jennings v Buchanan [2005] 2 NZLR 577
- Lange v Atkinson [1998] 3 NZLR 424 (CA)
- Reynolds v Times Newspapers [1999] 4 All ER 609 (HL)
- Lange v Atkinson [2000] 1 NZLR 257 (PC)
- Lange v Atkinson [2000] 3 NZLR 385 (CA)
- Vickery v McLean (2000) unreported, Court of Appeal, CA 125/00
Privacy edit
- Hosking v Runting [2005] 1 NZLR 1
- TVNZ v Haines (2005), CA 71/04
Vicarious Liability edit
- S v Attorney-General [2003] 3 NZLR 450 (CA)
- W v Attorney-General (2003) unreported, CA 227/02