{{Template:law}}
{{Template:study guide}}
{{Template:non-formal education}}
{{Template:0%done}}

Accident Compensation

edit

Statutes

edit

Injury Prevention Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2001

edit

Accident Compensation Act 1972

edit

Accident Compensation Act 1982

edit

Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Act 1992

edit

Accident Insurance Act 1998

edit

Accident Insurance Amendment Act 2000

edit

Cases

edit

G v Auckland Hospital Board [1976] 1 NZLR 638

edit

Walbutton v ACC

edit
  • Held
An accident is an event that is not intended by the person who suffers the misfortune.

Donselaar v Donselaar

edit

Willis v AG

edit

ACC v Mitchell

edit
  • Held
There is no need to show that an accident is caused by some external force. (Reversed by s3(a) 1992 Act)

ACC v F

edit
  • Facts
Husband sued for depression brought on by wife's injury.
  • Held
While the husband's depression was an unlooked for mishap, the husband’s injury was not the relevant accident and mental injury must accompany physical injury.

ACC v E

edit

Facts: E was required by her workplace to undergo a management course by her employer and subsequently suffered suffered mental breakdown.

Held: E was initially turned down for cover under the ACC scheme because it was thought that the scheme only covered mental injury which was accompanied by a physical injury. Court of Appeal overturned the decision, deciding "physical and mental" was to be interpreted generously, to be applied as "physical or mental." This indicates the courts desire to interpret ACC legislation with wide breadth.

QLDC v Palmer

edit

McGrory v Ansett NZ

edit

Harrild v Director of Proceedings

edit

Sivasubramanium v Yarrall

edit

Jordan v ACC

edit

ACC v Booth

edit

ACC v Auckland Health Board

edit

MacDonald v ACC (1985) 5 NZAR 276

edit

Green v Matheson

edit

Polansky v ACC

edit

Childs v Hillock

edit

Brownlie v Good Health Wanganui (2005) CA

edit
  • Held
Non-treatment is as much medical misadventure as negligent treatment

meow

A v Bottril [2003] 2 NZLR 721 (PC)

edit
see A v Bottril

McDermott v Wallace

edit

Articles

edit

Negligence

edit

Cases

edit

Duty of Care

edit
  • Anns v Merton LBC
  • South Pacific v NZ Security
  • Spring v Guardian Assocs
  • Midland Metals v ChCh Press
  • Rolls Royce v CHH

Auditors - Negligent Misstatement

edit
  • Scott Group v McFarlane
  • Caparo v Dickman
  • Boyd Knight v Purdue

Auditors - Other

edit
  • Price Waterhouse v Kwan
  • Deloitte Haskins & Sells v National Mutual Life
  • Wellington District Law Soc v PW

Council liability

edit
  • Anns v Merton LBC
  • Bowen v Paramount Builders
  • Brown v Heathcote CC
  • Murphy v Brentwood DC
  • Invercargill CC v Hamlin
  • Three Meade St v Rotorua DC

Cases v Govt #1

edit
  • X v Bedforshire CC (1995)
  • AG v Prince (1998)
  • Barrett v Enfield LBC (1999)

Cases v Govt #2

edit
  • A-G v Carter (2003)
  • A-G v Body Corporate (2005)
  • Tai Hobson v A-G (2006)

Nervous Shock

edit
  • Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire
  • Van Soest v Residentical Health Mgt Unit
  • W v Essex CC

Tort v Contractual Remedies

edit
  • Henderson v Merrett Syndicates
  • Turton v Kuslake
  • Rolls Royce NZ v CH

Limitation Period

edit
  • Invercargill CC v Hamlin

Nuisance

edit

Private Nuisance

edit
A-G v Geothermal Produce [1987] 2 NZLR 348
edit
BNZ v Greenwood [1984] 1 NZLR 525
edit
French v Auckland City Council [1974] 1 NZLR 340
edit
Hunter v Canary Wharf [1997] AC 655
edit
Hunter v Canary Wharf

Public Nuisance

edit

Rylands v Fletcher Nuisance

edit
Rylands v Fletcher [1866] LR 1 Ex 265
edit
Rickards v Lothian [1913] AC 263
edit
  • Facts
An unknown person intentionally blocked a drain on the defendant's property causing water to overflow and damage the plaintiff's stock.
  • Held:

1. An exception to Rylands & Fletcher liability - a person is not responsible for the acts of third parties.

2. Water supply and conveniences are not non-natural uses.
Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 WLR 53
edit
Hamilton v Papakura District Council [2000] 1 NZLR 265
edit
see Hamilton v Papakura District Council
Transco PLC v Stockport MBC [2004] 2 AC 1
edit
see Transco PLC v Stockport MBC

Defamation

edit

Statutes

edit

Cases

edit
  • Charleston v News Group Newspapers Ltd [1995] 2 AC 65
  • Mount Cook Group Ltd v Johnstone Motors [1990] 2 NZLR 488
  • Templeton v Jones [1984] 1 NZLR 448
  • Prebble v TVNZ [1994] 3 NZLR 1
  • Jennings v Buchanan [2005] 2 NZLR 577
  • Lange v Atkinson [1998] 3 NZLR 424 (CA)
  • Reynolds v Times Newspapers [1999] 4 All ER 609 (HL)
  • Lange v Atkinson [2000] 1 NZLR 257 (PC)
  • Lange v Atkinson [2000] 3 NZLR 385 (CA)
  • Vickery v McLean (2000) unreported, Court of Appeal, CA 125/00

Privacy

edit
  • Hosking v Runting [2005] 1 NZLR 1
  • TVNZ v Haines (2005), CA 71/04

Vicarious Liability

edit
  • S v Attorney-General [2003] 3 NZLR 450 (CA)
  • W v Attorney-General (2003) unreported, CA 227/02

See also

edit