May anyone call themselves a philosopher?

This resource is a wikidebate, a collaborative effort to gather and organize all arguments on a given issue. It is a tool of argument analysis or pro-and-con analysis. This is not a place to defend your preferred points of view, but original arguments are allowed and welcome. See the Wikidebate guidelines for more.

Subject classification: this is a philosophy resource.

Philosophy is the love of or the desire for wisdom. Everyone can philosophize. You ask yourself big questions and then think about those questions. But if everyone can philosophize, does that mean everyone may call themselves a philosopher, regardless of their experience or education? Or are there certain requirements for this?

Anyone may call themselves a philosopher

Pro

• Pro The term 'philosopher' is not protected, unlike 'doctor' or 'historian'. This means that anyone can call themselves a philosopher.
• Pro Everyone is a philosopher, since everyone does ask questions about life.
  • Objection Asking questions about life does not make one a philosopher and it's a false ungrounded assumption that everyone does so or further things.

Con

• Con You should have completed an accredited education in philosophy.
  • Objection What if people struggle with studying in school but are still good at philosophizing? Then they would never get the chance to call themselves a philosopher.
• Con You should be able to prove that you are engaged in philosophy if you want to call yourself a philosopher, otherwise even a non-philosopher with dishonest intentions can call himself a philosopher.