Wikiversity

Gravitational torsion field

Gravitational Field

edit

What are "Artificial Gravity Fields"? If you perceive gravity as a force, it can be defined as the acceleration due to gravity[1]. It's simple if it's seen that way even if some of the mathematical solutions might be difficult to solve. In retrospect, the Gravitational Field[2] in whichever glory of the definition may have been defined, it's about a field that exists between matter and energy. The problem is how to tap into the field. How can anyone understand something that's puzzled everyone since before Isaac Newton[3] existed. It's not evidential enough that space exploration proved that microgravity[4] exists. It seems that Zero gravity was changed to microgravity, and now it's weightlessness[5]. Most people do not believe in gravity. They probably don't want to believe in the force and field. Let's imagine that electrostatic[6], electrostatic discharge[7], and Electrostatic induction[8] are real.

Force Components

edit

Hypothetically the "gravitational tensor[9] [structure]" can be used in two forms. The force of gravity is harnessable in the dense atmospheric environment and the vacuumed atmospheric environment. It's not easy to find a solution for both densities even if it's easier to find a solution to harness the gravitational field in a dense atmosphere. Both solutions are achieved within resistivities in the range of 5GΩ to 1TΩ. The resistive range is within the high tensor structure moment of being massive. However, the tensor structure isn't active. The tensor structure is active only when it's a part of the circuitry so to speak, and the circuitry is functional.

The terminology I gave to resistive values within the range of being a gravitational tensor structure is Force Component:

Force Components

edit

Force Components Circuits

edit

The active tensor structure of Force Components allows objects to harness the gravitational field like being a massive object at very low current thresholds[10]. In nature, the mass and harmonic frequencies of the object alone allow gravitational fields to be active, present, or harnessable. Hence, imagine the massive body as being an active circuitry, with the absence of artificially active tensor structure Force Components in the so-called circuitry—The research to mimic that naturally occurring source of gravity was performed using active Force Components Circuits—or the massive objects' active tensor structure makeup. In retrospect of such research, the object harnessing the gravitational field does not have to be great in mass. The gravitational field of the object is potentially minor or microgravitational. Current amplitudes rose when Active Force Components were used in circuitry. Initially, after the first Force Components Circuits became functional ways to control high amplitude currents had to be found. The high current amplitudes can be controlled. However, they can be easily interfered. Current amplitudes rise as the gravitational field dissipates because >Terawatts at low currents allowed by the active tensor structure are retained since accumulated charges in the structure of the Force Components Circuits are retained. The retention leads to high amplitude feedback in the electric current if the functional Force Components Circuits are interfered with because the retained accumulated charges turn into high amplitude currents. That does not dissipate Force Components Circuits. The high amplitude feedback in electric currents then accumulates between the new and minute active tensor structure having the same mass however condensed and excreted as high amplitude current. That isn't what occurs within the active tensor structure of a massive solar body. It is what occurs when a Force Components Circuits is used as an active tensor structure.

By functioning from actively accumulating elementary charges[11], a Force Components Circuit, accumulates amplitudes of free charges in an approximation of unsafe proportions >50 Teravolts p-p in the X Threshold Amplitude (XTA) Nodes. These devices are used for research purposes in the Research Simulation sessions and should never be built by using that current configuration[12]. Firstly, the accumulation of electron and proton charges in the XTA core is comparable to a Neutron star[13] minus a combined particle state. There is no telling what near-miss state can be achieved as the XTA reaches saturation. Secondly, hypothetically the XTA core is also comparable to a hypothetical black hole since for approximately 1 second to ~40 minutes, depending on the Force Components Circuit configuration, a XTA accumulates with charges until it is saturated. The saturation of charges reaches >50 Teravolts p-p in the X Threshold Amplitude (XTA). The only solution to prevent that is to lower the XTA. The lowered XTA solutions took years to master. Even so, a high XTA low CTA Force Components Circuit is still potentially dangerous. Moreover, one important fact about a XTA is there is only one high polarity per Force Components Circuit. However, at minute nodes beyond the XTA, opposite charges accumulate. That might be a problem, however, it's only if two Force Components Circuits are configured with opposite high XTA polarity charges to function as one, can the XTA charges ever get seriously entwined. The fact that we are speaking of artificial gravitational fields contained in a jar (The Braithwaite Particle Trap Power Source managed by a Field Density Rectifier), before any truly bad things happen, most likely the jar will break if stressed too far. The other considerable problem with a Single High XTA or Dual High XTA is the effects of the harnessable gravitational fields. In all cases, the solution was to reduce the XTA and thus reduce the wattage amplitudes of the circuits before any hands-on research started in the research project.

Single and Dual XTAs

edit

Even if it takes two oppositely charged XTAs to form into a Neutron star or a black hole[14], with the Invention of Artificial Gravitational Fields[15], the potential of a Neutron star or a black hole formation is possible at some unknown threshold of high amplitude wattage at low current, and some unknown threshold of high current amplitude at high or low wattage that depends on the low density of the atmospheric medium. In the ongoing research efforts, it's possible that both likelihoods have been eliminated from the research project and won't be a problem during the hands-on research. Yet I neglect to remember that high amplitude wattage at low current, and high current amplitude at low wattage are still triggers to allow a black hole formation. "It's only one polarity per Force Components Circuit. However, at minute nodes beyond the XTA, opposite charges accumulate.". Depending on the Force Components Circuit configuration, those charges sometimes feed the XTA in conjunction with the XTA charging them up, and other times they take feedback of high current from the XTA in conjunction with the XTA charging them up. Therefore, those nodes are potentially event horizon nodes when they aren't dangerous to manage. "The retention [of charges from the active tensor structure] leads to high amplitude feedback in electric current. The high amplitude feedback in electric currents then accumulates between the new and minute active tensor structure having the same mass however condensed and excreted as high amplitude current.". High >Teravolt XTA discharges as high CTA. No energy is lost during the process because the charges are constantly renewed. The only difference is that CTA discharges at a higher threshold.

The Gravity of Earth Verses Artificial Gravitational Fields

edit

If the Artificial gravity is minor by being in the vicinity of a less massive object or an object having Force Components and a weakly active tensor structure makeup such as any object around us here on Earth, or if the less massive objects are influencing each other in the vicinity of the Gravity of Earth[16], it would not be the same as people being in microgravity and experiencing the "Effect[s] of spaceflight on the human body" or the effects of freefalling and Weightlessness. It simply means that the gravitational field is diminished. In microgravity, it will be that objects aren't prone to be very close due to inertia.

High Current Threshold Amplitude

edit

The diminished gravitational field of the Artificial Gravitational Fields' active tensor structure allows the increase in CTA. When Force Components are still in the makeup of the body in reference, and the active tensor structure makeup starts to dissipate charges, the current will start to rise in amplitude. "Current amplitudes rise as the gravitational field dissipates because the >Terawatts at very low currents allowed by the active tensor structure is retained since mass is retained.". Whatever happens after the active tensor structure is retained, it means the gravitational field has already been harnessable. That is why it's difficult to distinguish between the two different fields in currently existing theories about the difference between the electromagnetic field and the gravitational field. There are theories in Electrogravitics[17] and Gravitoelectromagnetism[18] that couldn't exactly stick with that being the gravitational field and nothing else. The truth is, I don't think anything good came from those ideas except conspiracies. The confusion and means of deployment are the reasons it is difficult to artificially create a gravitational field source.

Unprecedented Research

edit

It is unprecedented and what I have discovered on my own that distinguishes the solution between the two forces, is that the gravitational force has to be managed from a gravitational source from the high threshold of >Terawatts at very low currents and by gaining the vacuumed environment solution without losing the gravitational field integrity. I suppose it can also start by using the right current source, however, that will never lead to deliberately using Force Components in solving the problem. In that sense, there won't ever be a solution to the Unified field theory[19] without coming to a resolution from using a massive object or an object having an active tensor structure to allow the harnessing of the gravitational field. The solution also has applications in harnessing the electromagnetic field simultaneously. However, the gravitational field in those solutions can be completely dissipated.

The Dense Atmospheric Environment

edit

The Dense Atmospheric Environment (DAE) gravitational field's active tensor structure is reasonably between an impedance of 1/{2πfC}[20] as the field is accessed between the output nodes. With the active tensor structure of functional Force Components Circuits, configured to allow the accumulation of the charge amplitudes to force the impedance to behave differently by not shorting out the power source by turning it completely OFF, or causing feedback allowing dangerously high CTA, the gravitation field is harness able. The Force Components Circuits oscillating at 1GHz allow low current and low capacitance value output impedances to enable a parallel gravitational field to be harnessable in parallel to Dense Atmospheric Environment (DAE).

XTA and Current Control

edit

The low capacitance at the output impedance of the power source are only reference nodes. They can be jumped by as low as 1e-5 Ω and retain amplitudes of 140KW p-p at 6mA p-p. The initial threshold wattage before the output capacitor is jumped, or the low-value capacitance output impedance can allow 100TW p-p at <20A p-p in high Current Threshold Amplitude—These devices are used for research purposes in the Research Simulation sessions and should never be built by using that current configuration[21]—The low Current Threshold Amplitude via setting the variable resistor value to a high resistance allowing the current limit at the ground method of lowering output variables without the 1e-5 Ω jumper in parallel of the output nodes, can allow 12mA p-p and a wattage threshold of 140KW p-p. It is a very safe setting for the power source.

The Vacuumed Atmospheric Environment

edit

As the Vacuumed Atmospheric Environment (VAE) Densities of the initial threshold wattage of the low-value capacitance output impedance come into play by being placed in parallel to the atmospheric density, the dense atmospheric gravitational field dissipates. However, when the frequency of the naturally oscillating solid state[22] power source is still 1GHz, and the accumulated charge amplitudes to force the impedance to behave differently is still achievable, it's possible to retain the harnessed gravitational field. The gravitational field is retainable if the active tensor structure of the Force Components Circuits used to harness the field is retained. That solution was met by retaining the >Terawatts potential of the active tensor structure of the Force Components Circuits and in such a case it was discovered that the Current Threshold Amplitudes (CTA) of the device rises as the parallel output nodes are placed in parallel to the vacuumed environment. The solution however allows both atmospheric densities to complementally work together:.[23]. The solution also shows that the usage of artificial gravity is safer to manage in a dense atmosphere even if the byproduct of high CTA is potentially manageable[24] in the Vacuumed Atmospheric Environment if the right circuitry was designed.

Science Without Equations

edit

The research project started in 1995 and the final unpublished results were realized in 2023. Initially, there were equations used in finding solutions to allow the Force Components Circuits[25] [26] [Oscillating circuits with resistive components between nodes with a value greater than 1 Teraohm] to function within the circuit designs. The original solution which was developed from mathematics and the drawing of a circuit schematic, functioned on the first try while simulating it by using the student version of Pspice. The simulation solution showed a value in X Threshold Amplitude[27] [28]—the highest amplitude in saturated charges of the entire circuit or saturated nodes—output of ±750KV[29]. The range in accumulated charges is presented as ± to show the potential availability of positive and negative charges and the absence of oscillating charges manageable by the circuit. The solution will look like a two-dimensional solid pyramid placed on its side with the peak to the left, and the base to the right indicating a rise in amplitude, as it should look. This rise in amplitude, however, means that the output voltage is DC and for each value in a potential DC input from 0 to infinity, an output value is achievable. In this case, a 1.5V battery represents DC input as the infinite value, and |±750K|V represents the output value at infinity. It is a very odd DC output. The Current Threshold Amplitude or the highest value in current, in this case, of the entire circuit is approximately |±30m|A. The |±750K|V DC charges will accumulate within the entire circuit. It isn't a transient solution, however, both polarities of charges in voltage and current will be displayed as a solid two-dimensional pyramid. That remains to be true unless the circuit is unevenly grounded. It is not impossible that this happens even if the accumulated charges are isolated charges[27] [28] and low-value grounding components or coupling interferences will dissipate charges.

The functional circuit in the hands-on research will simply deplete the 1.5V batteries used in the experiment to power the circuit. The current hypothesis is that the ±750KV in DC is |±750K|V/2 = |±375K|V or the square root of |±750K|V = |27.386|V in some potentially dominating single polarity of saturated charges. In comparison, the |±750K|V output in charges is comparable to any battery charged at a maximum voltage. For instance, it can be defined as |±X|V+0V in ground charges because it's a whole value managed as 2 potential values. The current hypothesis is that the batteries in the experiment accumulated the X Threshold Amplitude charges rendering the batteries useless. The batteries will equal 0V when measured with a Digital Multimeter. The accumulated charges in the battery during the experiment won't even discharge when the batteries are shorted. The current hypothesis is that two oppositely charged batteries as such can probably be used as a power source. The other hypothesis is that the batteries will equal 0V when measured with a Digital Multimeter because they were depleted of charges. The standing hypothesis is the latter is incorrect because the output in accumulated charges is |±750K|V and perhaps the batteries that are removed from the charged circuit, then become depleted. Since it's a DC output not even an AC detection method can be used to solve the problem, except if the circuit was altered to become an oscillating circuit. Otherwise, even if the batteries are connected to the circuit they will equal 0V when measured with a Digital Multimeter.

The currently new withstanding project started in 2000. The first functional device was developed in 2003 and was submitted to be patented. It was only capable of accumulating a few millivolts in free charges, therefore the XTA was approximately 1.5VDC±10mV p-p AC. After that, I worked on transferring the free charges into other circuits. At some time after results were found showing that the newly developed devices might work. However, they seemed dangerous to work with physically.

The newly developed combined devices were developed to function as an oscillating circuit. Therefore, any solution can allow high-amplitude transient currents to pass through the circuit between any nodes. During one hands-on research session, that happened. After it was realized that this kind of science is dangerous and unpredictable, and all that was needed to be known of the physics of the solutions is that the equations to manage the solutions were simply 1/{2πfC} and 2πfC. All that had to be done next was to use a circuit schematic simulation application to enhance the hypotheses of the circuit is supposed to work according to the electrical field of study and the electronic of study.

The student version of Pspice wasn't very promising when used to solve oscillating circuits in transient sweeps that used DC batteries. It is expensive, and I don't know about it now, however, it was limited as a student version. Plus, Pspice can't crunch very high numbers. Most circuit schematic simulation applications can't crunch very high numbers; therefore, they freeze in simulations. Some can't calculate Capacitive Reactance[30] and Inductive Reactance circuit configurations for Force Components Circuits; The answers are not transient solutions.

Force Components Circuits are R+XC or R+XC+XL[31] circuits. When configured correctly and solved with the right circuit simulation application tools, the Capacitive Reactance and Inductive Reactance solutions are profound in their own rights. The circuits are solid-state devices, once made functional or into AC circuits, they are self-charging. Once turned ON they can only be SHUTOFF manually, by other circuit management features, or horrific outcomes of oscillating at high amplitude currents and or wattage, or low amplitude currents and high wattage. No equations must be derived from the solutions or used in solving the solutions to know how the results could be improved mathematically. The solutions become power sources that can be tapped to transfer the power to do work. The actual interferences gained from the functional circuits are from misuse. Once used correctly there is no problem.

It is true that without a supply of functional electric and electronic components, circuit analyzing tools, or the usage of a very powerful circuit simulation application, developing an oscillating circuit solution for a DC circuit would be very difficult, especially if the solution is applied to new research in developing oscillating circuits. However, only the rules in how components are used in configuring the circuit to work together are needed to find a solution. It is recommended that some devices be configured in a simulation environment because we sometimes do not know the true nature of functionality. What needs to be known from the hands-on research:

  1. The safest procedures to use in fabricating a prototype.
  2. The maximum limitations in output amplitude variables that will prevent dangerous outcomes by using the DAE and VAE solutions.
  3. The threshold output amplitude variables between the harnessable electromagnetic field and the harnessable gravitational field.
  4. Propulsion potential and speed versus the maximum limitations in output amplitude variables.
  5. Field strength of the maximum limitations in output amplitude variables.
  6. What is the difference between Force Components DAE Thrusters[32] and just winging it with what already exists[33]? I feel I already knew that nothing that's already possible would work. Even Nikola Tesla invented a potential propulsion system[34]. All the results so far seem like quantum propulsion in the DAE and potentially fillable propulsion in the VAE. This result in the research proves that no one has left the Earth using field thrusters or ionic thrusters.

Currently, data results are from simulating the Force Components Circuits. The simulation results are graphical outputs from the active devices that can power ON from elementary charges as they function as perpetually charged devices. The Simulation Research was performed by using LTspice[35]. Other successful Simulation Research solutions were achieved by simulating the devices by iCircuit[36]

Atmospherically Bound

edit

Lately, things started to go in the direction of Einstein's Special Relativity[37] and General Relativity[38]. That is only used in defining the DAE and VAE solutions. The DAE and VAE solutions were atmospherically bound until a way was found to traverse between the two densities without having to switch between solutions. Now one solution can be used in both eventualities.

DAE and VAE

edit

The Dense Atmospheric Environment (DAE) solution was found by working with capacitive components[39] and the Capacitive Reactance XC solution, 1/{2πfC}. The Vacuumed Atmospheric Environment solutions were found by using the potential of resistivity in a vacuum, which is potentially in the range of 1e-6 Ω to 1e-10 Ω, it's a definition of the Inductive Reactance XL solution, 2πfC, however, any XL ≥1e-5 Ω, is potentially a failing vacuumed environment solution if a solution in the range of 1e-6 Ω to 1e-10 Ω cannot be achieved. The original Vacuum Permittivity[40] solution requires a 3 feet distance between each resistive value in an array, and no actual solution exists. Perhaps if an Ion Thruster[41] is referenceable as a solution, we can imagine charges from elements may suffice as charges that can be used in parallel of the vacuumed environment to allow propulsion, however, those charges aren't an entire field array that can be used in a propulsion scheme. In this solution, the output nodes are capacitive as well as inductive since the resistivity between the VAE aligns with having a solution when the parallel resistivity is tiny and reactive as an inductive value and open and reactive as a capacitive value in the DAE. The output nodes allow an atmospheric density output in parallel of it no matter what. Either way, it's seen, in this case with a single resistive value high or low, or in respect of being a single resistive value, XC = XL in the VAE and output values between the output nodes are achieved, and the XC output nodes as the infinite value in parallel of the DAE is powerful. In that case, the current solution allows outputs between and current flow through resistivity in the range of 1e-10 Ω to infinity, and the DAE solution equals the VAE solution. That is not a description of equal amplitudes in wattage that is available to be used in parallel with the densities. It is that even though the amplitude in threshold wattage is low in the VAE solution and high in the DAE solution, there is power to allow propulsion. Plus, the right flight array will allow equally available propulsion power to traverse either density.

By using the active tensor structure of the Force Components Circuits to harness and retain the gravitational field, if any residual power accumulated between the 1e-6 Ω to 1e-10 Ω (ReN5[42]) output nodes is greater than W = 7.233lbs·ft p-p, the electromagnetic field was not harnessed. The gravitational field was harnessed and can lift 1lb, 5 feet in 3 seconds. That can be potentially lifted and the lifting potential increases as the wattage usage amplitudes are combined in series, parallel, or series-parallel, forming an array by using a single power source or multiple power sources. A single power source can manage thousands of components placed in parallel, series, or series-parallel of an output node. However, things would become more interesting if array grids were used, and each grid was managed by an independent power source. Potentially power would not diminish at the output grid if thousands of components in parallel add up to 1e-10 Ω, even below that threshold in resistivity, the limitation might be 1e-11 Ω. With each independent power source powering a grid, the stability and maximum power potential of each grid are enforced.

The field at the output node can be used to interact with any form of matter in parallel with the DAE and VAE.

It's OK to ignore the low amplitudes of accumulated wattage[43] values between the ReN5 component in parallel of the VAE. The resistive value (1e-10 Ω) of the component represents the parallel status of the output nodes. The solution is a great feat even at those minute amplitudes in wattage. There are better solutions[44]. They are simply not stable solutions. Even the low-value solution is better than any output you can work on within a hands-on experiment. A regular circuit in this case allows outputs of nothing.

Superconductivity[45] in the Research

edit

Room Temperature Superconductivity[46] is the byproduct in the absence of the gravitational field between the output nodes in parallel with the vacuumed atmospheric threshold component.

Notes

edit
  • Einstein tensor[47]
    • The tensor would allow an active force to withhold the formation of interacting masses of matter and energy between the Dense Atmospheric Threshold and Vacuumed Atmospheric Threshold, if not, the tensor is weak.
  • Ricci curvature: The difference between the gravitational field being parallel to the Dense Atmospheric Threshold and Vacuumed Atmospheric Threshold:
    • The Gravitational constant is the threshold between Permittivity and Vacuum Permittivity[48] allowed by the harnessing of the gravitational field.
  • Euclidean space:
    • In relative terms, space exists when a solution allowed by a harnessed gravitational field causes activity between the parallel Vacuumed Atmospheric Threshold.
  • The terms "Dense Atmospheric Threshold" and "Vacuumed Atmospheric Threshold":
    • The latter term concerns the gravitational field being parallel to a vacuumed environment. The former term denotes the gravitational field being parallel to any other massive medium or being parallel with the complete area of the solid mass.
  • Microgravity and the Force of Artificial Gravity are detrimental on the biological makeup of living organisms[49].

References

edit
  1. ↑ "Motion of Free Falling Object". Glenn Research Center.
  2. ↑ "Sources and Types of Gravitational Waves". LIGO Caltech.
  3. ↑ "Isaac Newton". HISTORY.COM EDITORS. March 10, 2015.
  4. ↑ "What is Microgravity?". NASA. Feb 13, 2009.
  5. ↑ "Why Are Astronauts Weightless?". Veritasium.
  6. ↑ "Radiation Shielding for Deep Space Missions". NASA.
  7. ↑ "The Heliopause Electrostatic Rapid Transit System (HERTS)" (PDF). NASA-MSFC--Advanced Concepts Office—.
  8. ↑ "Electrostatic Induction". Britannica.com.
  9. ↑ "10:02 / 28:22 • Curvature Einstein's Field Equations of General Relativity Explained". Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky.
  10. ↑ Braithwaite, Sherman. "DAE VAE".
  11. ↑ "3 Subatomic Stories: Charged leptons". Fermilab.
  12. ↑ Braithwaite, Sherman (PAUSEWATCH). "ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION USING CIRCUIT BOARD OR MICROCHIP III". Climate CoLab. Climate CoLab.
  13. ↑ "LIGO Scientists Spy Neutron Star Smash-Up That Blew Bling Into Space". seti.org. Oct 18, 2017.
  14. ↑ "SETI Talks: Black Holes Are Real. How Do They Shape Structure and Evolution in Our Universe?". SETI Institute.
  15. ↑ Angie, Bukley; William, Paloski; Gilles, Clément. "PHYSICS OF ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY" (PDF). NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  16. ↑ "How Strong is the Force of Gravity on Earth?". universetoday.com.
  17. ↑ Paul, Wagner (December 23, 2019). "Electrogravitics: Antigravity, Tesla, and a Military Cover-Up". gaia.com.
  18. ↑ Bahram, Mashhoon. "Gravitoelectromagnetism: A Brief Review" (PDF). Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Missouri-Columbia Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA.
  19. ↑ Andrew, Zimmerman Jones (May 15, 2018). "Albert Einstein: What Is Unified Field Theory?". thoughtco.com.
  20. ↑ "Capacitor". wikipedia.org.
  21. ↑ Braithwaite, Sherman (PAUSEWATCH). "ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION USING CIRCUIT BOARD OR MICROCHIP III". Climate CoLab. Climate CoLab.
  22. ↑ "Solid-state electronics". wikipedia.org.
  23. ↑ Braithwaite, Sherman. "ReN5".
  24. ↑ "American wire gauge". wikipedia.org.
  25. ↑ Risberg, Robert L. Jr. "Five Years without Infringement Litigation under the Semiconductor Chip Protection Act: Unmasking the Spectre of Chip Piracy in an Era of Diverse and Incompatible Process Technologies" (PDF).
  26. ↑ Lawrence B. Ebert. "What the Story of the Invention of the Transistor Teaches Us About 21st Century Patent Practice, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 80 (2008)".
  27. ↑ 27.0 27.1 "Static Electricity". allaboutcircuits.com. allaboutcircuits.com.
  28. ↑ 28.0 28.1 "Elementary Charge". EWT. EWT.
  29. ↑ Anne, Helmenstine (July 10, 2021). "What Is Absolute Value? Definition and Examples". SCIENCE NOTES. SCIENCE NOTES.
  30. ↑ "Electrical reactance". wikipedia. wikipedia.org.
  31. ↑ Chuan-Zheng Lee. "Transient response of RC and RL circuits" (PDF). Stanford University.
  32. ↑ Braithwaite, Sherman (PAUSEWATCH). "RELOCATION STRATEGY; Electric Propulsion Engines (FAD)". Climate CoLab. Climate CoLab.
  33. ↑ "The Next Generation of Ionic Plasma Thrusters (BSI MARK 2)". youtube.com. Plasma Channel.
  34. ↑ "Nikola Tesla's flying saucer: electromagnetic field lift experiments". nexusnewsfeed.com. nexusnewsfeed.com.
  35. ↑ "LTspice". Analog Devices. Analog Devices.
  36. ↑ "iCircuit". icircuitapp. Krueger Systems Inc.
  37. ↑ Vicky, Stein (February 1, 2022). "Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity". space.com. space.com.
  38. ↑ Nola, Taylor Tillman; Meghan, Bartels; Scott, Dutfield (May 14, 2023). "What is the theory of general relativity?". space.com. space.com.
  39. ↑ Braithwaite, Sherman. "DAE VAE".
  40. ↑ "Vacuum Permittivity". sciencedirect.com. sciencedirect.com.
  41. ↑ Dan, M. Goebel; Ira, Katz. "Fundamentals of Electric Propulsion: Ion and Hall Thrusters" (PDF). Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology.
  42. ↑ Braithwaite, Sherman. "ReN5".
  43. ↑ Braithwaite, Sherman. "18 11 2022 23 45 27 REC".
  44. ↑ Braithwaite, Sherman. "18 11 2022 23 45 27 REC".
  45. ↑ "superconductivity". britannica.com. britannica.com.
  46. ↑ Braithwaite, Sherman. "Superconductivity in a Vacuumed Environment".
  47. ↑ "10:02 / 28:22 • Curvature Einstein's Field Equations of General Relativity Explained". Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky.
  48. ↑ "Vacuum Permittivity". sciencedirect.com. sciencedirect.com.
  49. ↑ ADAM, HADHAZY (April 2017). "Artificial gravity's attraction". aerospaceamerica.aiaa.org.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Gravitational_torsion_field&oldid=2634980"