Empathy Models/Empathy Model/Predatory economics
Email with Ellen Brown
Deflation vs. predatory economics (Humbolt squid)
Hi Ellen, I liked the article very much. It is so refreshing to see someone with communication skills serve-up economic reality.
You wrote: "However, the scenario most feared today is actually deflation – a lack of available dollars to fuel the economy. Asset values have collapsed, and savings have collapsed along with them."
I feel that is nothing to fear! But only if the cash supply dries up because people are keeping their money in their accounts, and not giving it to the government or corporations, both of which are pyramid structures, and hence ponzi cultures.
The last idea, ponzi culture, is what I am successfully describing as universally made up of mental defectives, specifically predators, through my study of empathic neurons in animals. Think of the say "The more people I meet, the more I like my dogs."
The people running the show are not just mildly retarded, they are so deficient in functioning empathic neurons that they are below any mammal in terms of conceptual or collaborative ability. All they can do is kill to take which explains our endless war situation. And they can create complicated ponzi schemes; they are intelligent and cunning, just lacking the key evolutionary mental advances.
~~John
Ellen Brown
Hi John, that's an interesting take! I think we've all got those genes though...
Feb 23 (1 day ago) Ellen BrownLoading... Feb 23 (1 day ago) Ellen Brown to me
show details Feb 23 (1 day ago)
Reply
Hi John, that's an interesting take! I think we've all got those genes though, and we're sort of forced to resort to them in the system we're stuck in. You HAVE to have your money making money, so you have something to live on in old age when you can't work. But if money is making money, it's not producing anything; and it's necessarily taking money away from those who are producing. We're all in on the ponzi scheme. The system itself has to be changed, not just the mindset. Best, Ellen
- Show quoted text -
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:48 AM, John wrote:
Hi Ellen, I liked the article very much. It is so refreshing to see someone with communication skills serve-up economic reality.
You wrote: "However, the scenario most feared today is actually deflation – a lack of available dollars to fuel the economy. Asset values have collapsed, and savings have collapsed along with them."
I feel that is nothing to fear! But only if the cash supply dries up because people are keeping their money in their accounts, and not giving it to the government or corporations, both of which are pyramid structures, and hence ponzi cultures.
The last idea, ponzi culture, is what I am successfully describing as universally made up of mental defectives, specifically predators, through my study of empathic neurons in animals. Think of the say "The more people I meet, the more I like my dogs." The people running the show are not just mildly retarded, they are so deficient in functioning empathic neurons that they are below any mammal in terms of conceptual or collaborative ability. All they can do is kill to take which explains our endless war situation. And they can create complicated ponzi schemes; they are intelligent and cunning, just lacking the key evolutionary mental advances. ~~John
John van V.
to Ellen
show details Feb 23 (1 day ago)
Reply
Yes that is all correct. I avoid the real definitions online, because
I have learned that there are defective-advocates who uses google to
stalk anyone mentioning empathic defects.
The diseases are:
- aspergers
- bi-polar
- cocaine/methadrine addiction
The last two can be treated, but the first is genetic.
Unfortunately, lack or loss of morals is the main symptom of an unempathic disorder, so lying is easy for the "sufferers." In fact, "faking" human nature is the accepted Asperger's syndrome therapy.
What we are learning from the Humbolt giant squid, is that empathic neurons are in no way necessary for predatory cooperation; actually neither is intelligence. All that is necessary is rudimentary binary communication. And they consume each other, much the organ-harvesters of China and India.
What is the solution? Going back to nature. So far I think the best text is Kropotkin's Mutual Aid. Here in my New England city of Torrington, CT, I suggest simply re-opening the factories -- just open them. Let the workers and community figure out what to do from there to start manufacturing.
Probably 100% recycling is a good place to start, but I know rural people: they like fast cars and pickups. Cars are terrible as they are, ask any mechanic--its an open market. We can use the Interent to design and distribute component parts. In fact we have no need for the economic super-struture.
Hugs, John
PS, I am going to try to re-work your text a little to start a wikiversity.org page on the topic. - Show quoted text -
John van V.
to Ellen
show details Feb 23 (1 day ago)
Reply
Oh, a misconception that I am proving w/ my cat. She has dropped the
blood model she used to survive before I found her, and now "catches
and releases" mice since she has become a house cat.
You wrote: " I think we've all got those genes > though, and we're sort of forced to resort to them in the system we're stuck > in."
You are talking about "selfish genes." There is no such thing, what you are thinking of is "digital" as opposed to "emotional" communication and thinking (but mostly communication). The genes are emotional communication and mathematical. Since we live in an "asperger's culture," then we are forced to shut down the emotional communication facilities and become mathematical or robotic. We are told this is viciousness, but in fact it is simply devoid of emotion. That is what is called anthropomorphism.
Since there is no literature to support my model directly, I am constructing it from the environment around me, and finding that psychology is nearly pure lie. When using a model system rather than a hypothesis, the only criteria is success. If the model works for me and others try it, then it is a success and can move on to the theory stage of the scientific method.