We proof the statement by induction over , So suppose that
and set
.
Let
and
with
be the relevant row. By definition, we have
.
Due to the induction hypothesis, we have
for
,
because two rows coincide in these cases. Therefore,
-
where
.
The matrices
and
consist in the same rows, however, the row
is in the -th row and in the -th row. All other rows occur in both matrices in the same order. By swapping altogether times adjacent rows, we can transform into . Due to the induction hypothesis and
fact,
their determinants are related by the factor , thus
.
Using this, we obtain