Big bang/a Understanding of the structure of energy leads to incorrect arguments against BBT

(Review Paper) Cited in Big bang/a Understanding of the structure of energy leads to incorrect arguments against BBT

Understanding of the structure of energy leads to incorrect arguments against BBT edit

According to Hogan's article, Einstein's Theory of Space and Time asserts that energy and light are smooth; leading to the assumption that CBR would be evenly distributed when observed. Hogan writes that CBR observations have shown that radiation fluctuates over the observed area, this suggests that the BBT is incorrect. However, because energy is filled with hills and valleys (it is not smooth), it makes sense that we would see varying densities when observing CBR. Think of a desk, at the macro level it appears to us as smooth, but micro observations prove otherwise, this same error is akin to what's happening with the CBR related arguments disproving BBT.

Further more, Hogan asserts that evidence for this error in Einstein's theory comes from the introduction of Quantum Physics to Space Time Physics supported by Stephen Hawking's Theory of Hawking Radiation which argues black holes convert energy information into different forms. [1]

Results edit

While this argument does not prove the validity of BBT in itself, it attempts to argue against the assumption that CBR would be uniform as is used when attacking BBT. In effect it invalidates the CBR argument. BBT may still be false, but not for this reason.

References edit

  1. Hogan, C. (2002) Understanding of the structure of energy leads to incorrect arguments against BBT. American Scientist, 90(5) P. 420. Retrieved from: http://www.americanscientist.org/issues/issue.aspx?id=789&y=2002&no=5&content=true&page=2&css=printl